TP2000
Well-Known Member
$80.90 ==will it continue into the 70's
It's certainly a weird route to take to get to $250 by 2026.
$80.90 ==will it continue into the 70's
I’ve never paid much attention, I let a financial advisor handle my IRA. I feel comfortable in safe investments like CDs, not day trading.
Now 79.83.
Agreed. Every movie they don't make is a movie they wont lose 100 million on.It would be a great time to pull more moves that sour people on the brand and loyalty to it.
Agreed. Every movie they don't make is a movie they wont lose 100 million on.
80.04 what are the odds it will close below 80 today
Disney isn’t day trading. If you invested in Disney April 1st 2014 at 85.74 you would be losing money 9 years later.I’ve never paid much attention, I let a financial advisor handle my IRA. I feel comfortable in safe investments like CDs, not day trading.
Especially Considering that $85.75 then was worth more than the $80.50 is today after 30 trillion or so in QEDisney isn’t day trading. If you invested in Disney April 1st 2014 at 85.74 you would be losing money 9 years later.
Any acquisition of Disney by another company, including Apple, could lead to new leadership for any number of positions at Disney including the Head of Disney Parks.A lot of people are not happy with Josh's leadership style with the parks espically with "What if "D23 expos and lenghty timelines for park project builds. If an Apple buyout did happen could Josh be forced out of his role as head of the parks and could Apple put their finger on the scale and speed up the construction times in the parks?
Are you saying that before Josh, park projects were built in a timely manner?A lot of people are not happy with Josh's leadership style with the parks espically with "What if "D23 expos and lenghty timelines for park project builds.
Sure, the devil you know can definitely be better than the devil you don't. But are we so sure selling the parks off would be a bad thing? I'm not. If they go to a company with a more long term view, and one who doesn't need to use the parks as an ATM for other struggling divisions, it could actually be a huge win.Any acquisition of Disney by another company, including Apple, could lead to new leadership for any number of positions at Disney including the Head of Disney Parks.
I would however suggest that if such an acquisition happened it wouldn't lead to immediate changes, nor an increase in construction spending and speed up of construction projects. Any company coming in would surely take their time to assess everything including any new capital intensive construction projects before making any changes. Changes mind you that may include a complete shutdown of any new Disney Parks projects or even selling off the Disney Parks division completely.
This is why all these folks hoping Apple or any other company buys Disney should slow down on that talk. As the saying goes careful what you wish for, you may just get it. And it may not be better....
I think there's a good chance the parks will be spun off into their own entity, because the buyers of Disney probably want nothing to do with their real estate + theme park businesses. I'd love to see what the vision for DVC and the parks could be with different leadership (tho obviously it could be much much worse also)Sure, the devil you know can definitely be better than the devil you don't. But are we so sure selling the parks off would be a bad thing? I'm not. If they go to a company with a more long term view, and one who doesn't need to use the parks as an ATM for other struggling divisions, it could actually be a huge win.
At one time I would have considered such an idea sacrilege. But that was when Disney was still at least sort of Disney. Today's Disney is exactly the kind of company we would not want to purchase the parks. Short-sighted, poorly managed and willing to bleed the parks to prop up other divisions.
It depends on who would be a buyer in this scenario. For example would Six Flags be better for Disney Parks? We can't say, but not really confident it would be better....Sure, the devil you know can definitely be better than the devil you don't. But are we so sure selling the parks off would be a bad thing? I'm not. If they go to a company with a more long term view, and one who doesn't need to use the parks as an ATM for other struggling divisions, it could actually be a huge win.
At one time I would have considered such an idea sacrilege. But that was when Disney was still at least sort of Disney. Today's Disney is exactly the kind of company we would not want to purchase the parks. Short-sighted, poorly managed and willing to bleed the parks to prop up other divisions.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.