I can say with honesty I know how difficult it must be for a professor to feel connected when talking to a camera... but I also can say that when I sat in those 400 person lecture halls at 8am .. I probably read the newspaper more than I ever interacted with the professor or my classmates
Yes, I agree; It depends on a whole range of variables what kind of work environment works best for different people and jobs. Having taught online and in class, I saw plusses and minuses to both approaches and, in some ways, felt I was more able to shape the content with online teaching and especially pre-recorded clips than with standing up and talking for two hours in front of PowerPoint slides. Then again, students rarely asked questions and participated for the larger online courses and it was hard to tell if people paid more or less attention to the content than if they were physically in a lecture hall. Again, probably depends on the individual student and lecturer. Personally, I was, again, kind of agnostic as a lecturer what worked better for me.
My overall sense, though, was that the students did better being around each other than drifting off and watching things at their own pace. Even if they spend the lectures hungover and falling asleep, it's all a learning and social experience in terms of managing time, taking responsibility for how you do that, and just going through a shared experience, even if that involves complaining about how boring the lectures are! The pandemic was its own thing, but it has been a bit rocky bringing those student cohorts that had their early experiences of university online into class and getting them to show up, submit things on time, etc. I don't know if that entirely translates to the workplace, but I could see how in some contexts it might.
I wonder whether there will be more nuance to this directive than Iger's statement implies anyway. For example, will the same rules really apply to IT, Imagineering, all the different roles in the studios, Disney+, etc?