RobidaFlats
Well-Known Member
But this is Disney. Guest concerns doesn't drive their decisions, money does. They've proven this over and over for the past 20+ years. Parks too crowded? Let's charge more to get in. Downtown Disney not doing so hot? Build high-end stores that attract the upper middle class.
If Disney sees their guests spending money on something other than their brand while they are staying on their property, they are gonna tap into that market. This is the reason why Disney mini golf, bowling, Characters in Flight, DisneyQuest, Pleasure Island (retired), and other optional onsite entertainment came into existence. Their goal is to keep your money on a steady stream from your pocket to their bank account.
All true. However, none of it changes the fact that the loss of income to Uber drivers should not be a deciding factor in anything. As you stated in your first post, the ideal outcome would be improved transportation. This would also lead to loss of income.
Thus your argument that the main reason that they should not attempt an Uber-like service is due to loss of income for Uber drivers doesn't make sense. Your most recent post doesn't address that at all and my statement of what should be the deciding factor (regardless of what Disney actually does) stands.