Nick Wilde
Well-Known Member
$400,000,000 on DA. Heard this on Yahoo and Orlando Informer.Universal spent a lot more than $225 million on DA, didn't they?
$400,000,000 on DA. Heard this on Yahoo and Orlando Informer.Universal spent a lot more than $225 million on DA, didn't they?
Song of the South was re-released to theaters in 1986 for the film's 40th anniversary and to promote the then-upcoming Splash Mountain. This was back when home video was still relatively new, so the movie wasn't exactly obscure when Splash Mountain opened in Disneyland three years later.I just wish someone at Disney would answer the question - Why is it that an obscure movie from 1946 gets a beloved E-Ticket (and one of the best attractions at WDW) and their most successful animated movie in recent time gets shoehorned into the Maelstrom? Everyone gets a bad deal here. Frozen fans get short changed of a real (and much deserved) E-Ticket. Maelstrom (and EPCOT Center) fans lose. Epcot gets a net gain of 0 attractions. Lets face it - World Showcase really could use a few more attractions and not at the expense of current attractions. At this point - every park at WDW needs MORE attractions NOT replacements!
Perhaps Epcot just isn't a good choice for your family at this point. If your kids aren't interested in Epcot, why not just take them somewhere else?While i agree with your general sentiments, my kids are young and love Frozen (DS2 squeals for joy when he sees the animated castle w/ the 'Naa Naa Naa..' starting). When we went/go back to DW again, we'll have no reason to go to Epcot till the re-imaging of Norway happens. The kids are too young to enjoy it still. This might make the park a 1/2 day visit instead of a monorail ride around for us. Our kids won't care about how long the wait and short the ride was. It's the fact that they went on it. The whole time waiting to ride AND riding will be what counts to them.
Disney is just trying to sing 'let it go' to our cash a little bit quicker and it's going to be a net gain for Epcot in the end.
$.01
Right. So saying $75mil is a third of that is extremely incorrect.$400,000,000 on DA. Heard this on Yahoo and Orlando Informer.
Sure. Until official confirmation was given by the company, it was still a rumor. Just like it was an unconfirmed rumor when an 'insider' stated that they were going to totally remove Norway from the pavillion and officially make it an 'Arendelle' pavillion. Insider rumors are awesome, but they aren't confirmed until the company confirms them. The insiders actually benefit from this take on it because they are allowed to save face with the understanding that sometimes companies change their plans.Just like Maelstrom wasn't being replaced with a Frozen ride, right?
I've seen it reported as 250 million, 256 million and 400 million so not sure. I think Jimmy Fallon announced it as 256 million, but he may have confused it with Hogsmeade. Either way, $75 million should be enough to do the job right. That's about $74.9 million more than I would have expected them to spend.Universal spent a lot more than $225 million on DA, didn't they?
Jim Hill article on Frozen ride:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-h...-the_b_5835170.html?ncid=txtlnkusaolp00000592
He seems to be confirming that the ride system will not change and the changes to load/unload talked about here.
You're correct there! What I read was that Hogsmeade was around $250 million, and they refused to say how much DA cost. I think it cost MUCH more than what most people think, personally. Still doesn't change the fact the Disney should be able to do more with less in WDW.I've seen it reported as 250 million, 256 million and 400 million so not sure. I think Jimmy Fallon announced it as 256 million, but he may have confused it with Hogsmeade. Either way, $75 million should be enough to do the job right. That's about $74.9 million more than I would have expected them to spend.
When we went/go back to DW again, we'll have no reason to go to Epcot till the re-imaging of Norway happens. The kids are too young to enjoy it still. This might make the park a 1/2 day visit instead of a monorail ride around for us. Our kids won't care about how long the wait and short the ride was. It's the fact that they went on it. The whole time waiting to ride AND riding will be what counts to them.
It was already announced by Disney that the ride will take you through the fictional land of Arendelle.In trying to curb this wound, I've been looking for hope somewhere....here's the best I've got. Say what you will about Gran Fiesta Tour, at the end of the day it's still about Mexico (in a roundabout way). Might the same be said of the Maesltrom change? That it might NOT become a superficial "FROZEN:THE RIDE" akin to Little Mermaid, Peter Pan, etc. but maybe more along the lines of "Spirit of Norway: Featuring Olaf"? I'm using what they did to the stave church as a jumping off point....still about Norway, but we use Frozen to sell it?
I sent emails to Staggs, Crofton, and Holmes expressing my disappointment and the response I received from Disney services said "the ride will take you along your favorite scenes and songs from the movie", so I dont think there will be much of anything about Norway unless they just flat out lie and claim that the movie takes place in Norway.In trying to curb this wound, I've been looking for hope somewhere....here's the best I've got. Say what you will about Gran Fiesta Tour, at the end of the day it's still about Mexico (in a roundabout way). Might the same be said of the Maesltrom change? That it might NOT become a superficial "FROZEN:THE RIDE" akin to Little Mermaid, Peter Pan, etc. but maybe more along the lines of "Spirit of Norway: Featuring Olaf"? I'm using what they did to the stave church as a jumping off point....still about Norway, but we use Frozen to sell it?
Disney budgets do tend to end up bloated so its hard to compare to Universal.Right. So saying $75mil is a third of that is extremely incorrect.
Right. So saying $75mil is a third of that is extremely incorrect.
While i agree with your general sentiments, my kids are young and love Frozen (DS2 squeals for joy when he sees the animated castle w/ the 'Naa Naa Naa..' starting). When we went/go back to DW again, we'll have no reason to go to Epcot till the re-imaging of Norway happens. The kids are too young to enjoy it still. This might make the park a 1/2 day visit instead of a monorail ride around for us. Our kids won't care about how long the wait and short the ride was. It's the fact that they went on it. The whole time waiting to ride AND riding will be what counts to them.
Disney is just trying to sing 'let it go' to our cash a little bit quicker and it's going to be a net gain for Epcot in the end.
$.01
Well hopefully since the Frozen craze is so just that - crazy -, they'll try a little harder on this one. And since they sort of tried to help the DCA Mermaid, they must be aware of the reception of the Mermaid ride as a whole. Maybe they'll use it as a learning experience.
Trying to be positive here, people.
Why not expose your children to the beauty and cultures of World Showcase while they are young? If you let them think its ALL about riding rides then thats what they will grow up thinking and they will miss out on so many wonderful things. Ive seen children (my nephews as well) as young as 2 years old watch Matsuriza in pure amazement, or stare in wonder at the dolphins and fish swimming in the aquarium. There is still a lot of educational value in EPCOT for children AND they have fun while doing it, you just have to make the tiniest bit of effort. It is what EPCOT Center was built for. It was never supposed to be ALL about rides.
IMO Test Track 2.0 looks pretty cheap. The old environmental rooms and the robots were much better than the empty scanning rooms there now. Also remember that part of Frozen's budget will be used on the M&G, store and maybe the bakery and restaurant as well. Plus unlike Test Track there will be animatronics so that will cut into even more of the budget. $75 million will go pretty fast and not all of it on the ride.Disney budgets do tend to end up bloated so its hard to compare to Universal.
Apples to apples - Test Track 2.0 in 2012 had a lower budget. I think around $60M. It also took less time. If the budget and timeframe are accurate it should be a more substantial retheme than Test Track, but not by a whole lot. Probably in the same ballpark.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.