Did you enjoy the Royal Wedding?

[bmarkelon]

But... I immediately saw the "Hidden Mickey":

The Canadian commentators even made a Disney-related comment when she stepped out of her car in it! :lol:

Love it! But doesn't it look more like a Hidden Minnie? :shrug:

 

[draybook]

You could extend that argument to all state occasions, like the recent multi million pound visit of the head peado that the tax payer has now to pick up.

However unlike that the wedding is definitely in the black in terms of economic value if the figures are to be believed.

Indeed, and if that visit received as much publicity as the wedding did, I'd be vocal about that too.

 

[CAPTAIN HOOK]

The hat's there to ensure that if you look, you don't stare at her ugly face

 

[Banksy]

But... I immediately saw the "Hidden Mickey":

The Canadian commentators even made a Disney-related comment when she stepped out of her car in it! :lol:

Cinderella (Kate) and the evil (I feel bad saying ugly...Oh wait) Step sisters. :king:

 

[dave&di]

Actually, that isn't my opinion. It has nothing to do with being important in any given country. This is about a wedding getting more press(at least here) than a major disaster in Japan, and the 300+ that died in the recent rash of tornadoes.

I just don't get it, and that's ok, some people don't get my likes either. I just don't understand why some wedding between a guy who's like what, 33rd in line for the crown and some chick is that important. I don't care where they're from, it's just a wedding. Just like they were making articles about the little girl frowning, or Kate's sister, or the lady with the ridiculous hat. Out of four main headlines on Yahoo on that mroning, these four took up all four spots. Is some rediculous hat really that important?

And what does service have to do with anything? I did my three years in the US Army, but I have respect for every country. I also don't care if any of our political people are getting married. There's more pressing issues at hand than a wedding. Just think of how many homeless people could have had a nice meal with the money spent on that wedding.

It's their right to have a big beautiful wedding, and that's cool, I just think it was a bit much and wasteful.

33rd? 2nd actually! He will be king after Prince Charles.

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

33rd? 2nd actually! He will be king after Prince Charles.

Or possibly instead of.......

 

[dave&di]

Or possibly instead of.......

Isn't it already known Charles will be next, I thought it was? Poor Charlie deserves a go!

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Isn't it already known Charles will be next, I thought it was? Poor Charlie deserves a go!

Theres been rumours for years that they may skip Chuck because of horseface.

 

[dave&di]

Theres been rumours for years that they may skip Chuck because of horseface.

Horseface :ROFLOL: Thats hilarious! I must admit although I would like Charles to be king I would not want Camilla as Queen, but I believe she wouldn't get that title anyway. I get a feeling Lizzie will be around for a long time yet anyway, BUT I'll let her off as I want to see more of Phillip's gaffes. :hammer:

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Phil the Greek is a legend. Still pretty sprightly for a man of his age.

 

[LeafsFanNL]

Upon the passing of Elizabeth, Charles will be king. There is no mechanism to bypass him. I suppose he could abdicate upon his mothers death, passing the throne to William, but abdication is a pretty drastic notion. I cannot see him doing so. Mind you with his grandmother as an example the Queen may have many good years ahead of her, and his reign could be very short indeed.

 

[rsoxguy]

Upon the passing of Elizabeth, Charles will be king. There is no mechanism to bypass him. I suppose he could abdicate upon his mothers death, passing the throne to William, but abdication is a pretty drastic notion. I cannot see him doing so. Mind you with his grandmother as an example the Queen may have many good years ahead of her, and his reign could be very short indeed.

Let's say that Charles is invited to William and Kate's place for an in-law's dinner night at the newlywed's pad. Let's also say that Kate is a hurry to move into the royal castle, or whatever they call it. Let us further say that she "accidentally" puts rat poison in her father-in -law's Jello mold. Boom, you've got yourself a new front-runner for King.

 

[Pumbas Nakasak]

Well its worked that way for centuries.

 

[CAPTAIN HOOK]

Let's say that Charles is invited to William and Kate's place for an in-law's dinner night at the newlywed's pad. Let's also say that Kate is a hurry to move into the royal castle, or whatever they call it. Let us further say that she "accidentally" puts rat poison in her father-in -law's Jello mold. Boom, you've got yourself a new front-runner for King.

Mmmm - you've also got a "would be" queen in the tower for murder. Bet that gets more media coverage than the wedding

 

[rsoxguy]

Mmmm - you've also got a "would be" queen in the tower for murder. Bet that gets more media coverage than the wedding

As long as the torch-bearing rabid peasants wore funny hats, I'd watch.

 

[LeafsFanNL]

Let's say that Charles is invited to William and Kate's place for an in-law's dinner night at the newlywed's pad. Let's also say that Kate is a hurry to move into the royal castle, or whatever they call it. Let us further say that she "accidentally" puts rat poison in her father-in -law's Jello mold. Boom, you've got yourself a new front-runner for King.

It is about 300 years too late for that kind of stuff

 

[rsoxguy]

They had Jello back then?