Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
Folks gotta leave Mission Space alone please.
I really like Wall-E a lot too and Eve as well!I love Wall-E -- don't think it works for Mission: Space, though.
Id be shocked if it was done before 2028. 4-5 years is what we are looking at with todays pace.They would have to break ground today to have a fleeting hope at having a whole new land ready by 2025. Realistically if announced soon, I would say 2026
In terms of rethemes, I can’t think of a good candidate outside of Epcot (Figment/Mission Space) so I think 2025 might be entertainment driven.
FWIW, it has a height requirement that is 8" shorter than the height requirement for Incredicoaster (which has an IP that is similarly targeted towards kids)and {Mission Space's] too intense for a kid's IP (unless you make it all like Green, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the ride system).
I would personally keep WALL-E in my back pocket in case of forced IP in Living with the Land. You could really lightly theme it to a partnership between EPCOT, the Department of Agriculture, and the Buy n Large bots to retain almost everything that’s there with a few figures thrown in.
4 yrs? It took them like 6 to build a restaurant. 4 would be a huge improvement. Lolpay your construction team to get it done in 2 1/2 years not 4.
Just give us some new missions. The video can't be that hard to update.I think it would be pretty difficult to retheme Mission: Space. It wouldn't be impossible, but there just aren't many options for that system that don't involve space travel -- and it's too intense for a kid's IP (unless you make it all like Green, but that kind of defeats the purpose of the ride system).
Considering they just built Space 220, I doubt they have plans to make changes there anytime soon.
FWIW, it has a height requirement that is 8" shorter than the height requirement for Incredicoaster (which has an IP that is similarly targeted towards kids)
And is why they created the less intense Green team.The height requirement isn't really the concern, though -- it's the overall intensity.
What’s better a dedicated franchise land or a land that has rides from different franchisesThey should have put an UP land to represent South America in Animal Kingdom. I honestly want original lands, not copy and pastes. Plus the recently announced hot pursuit ride, I could only imagine might be controversial in America.
Disney needs to stop with re-purposing attractions to save money. It would be a travesty to not have a dinosaur section remain in a place called Animal Kingdom. Keep the boneyard, the dinosaur ride (with some updates maybe, calmer, or something maybe) and then EXPAND the park and attractions offered.
That’s a great idea actually. Would be easier to hide the city looking area from the rest of the animal kingdom theming as well.Yeah, agreed. And there is that big spot behind Kali before Rafiki's and if they insist on putting Zootopia there build it there and then take the train to that area like the train is a big part of the movie
YeahThat’s a great idea actually. Would be easier to hide the city looking area from the rest of the animal kingdom theming as well.
Dinosaur the ride and the idea of dinosaurs at DAK, I'm pretty sure everyone agrees that Chester and Hesters is awful.Hello, coming from the DL forums so apologies if my question is dumb.
I know one of the big rumors for this weekend is Zootopia coming to AK (which I think is a huge mistake and antithetical to the thesis of the park), and people are suspecting it'll likely take over Dinoland, but can someone explain to me what about Dinoland has people wanting to keep it around? Is it DINOSAUR? Is it Dinorama? I can't crack it from my POV. I visited Animal Kingdom last month for the first time and was underwhelmed with that entire section of the park so I'm not sure if I'm missing something.
Hello, coming from the DL forums so apologies if my question is dumb.
I know one of the big rumors for this weekend is Zootopia coming to AK (which I think is a huge mistake and antithetical to the thesis of the park), and people are suspecting it'll likely take over Dinoland, but can someone explain to me what about Dinoland has people wanting to keep it around? Is it DINOSAUR? Is it Dinorama? I can't crack it from my POV. I visited Animal Kingdom last month for the first time and was underwhelmed with that entire section of the park so I'm not sure if I'm missing something.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.