News Cost Cutting Measures Coming Early 2025

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
That is typical after price increases across the board...and added programs where your admission ticket gives you a basic experience, but then you have to pay an additional $10-$20 to go on the more popular rides.... and now cost cutting measures that will no doubt lessen the experience... With all the increased prices I would expect them to be enhancing the experience for the guests...
 

FiestaFunKid

Well-Known Member
All for a stupid stock price...

When will stockholders and the rich realize they would actually benefit from investment in the parks and not cuts??

Has over-investment ever killed a park or a project? Sure! But have cuts ever improved visitation numbers? No.

The obsession with per-guest spending is a direct result of the cuts, you need to find the money for the revenue sheets somewhere and that's where it will come from.

It genuinely feels like Disney would rather have 10 people spend $100 million on one vacation each rather than a million people spend $1,000 each which is absurd
Yes - but you are taking a measured long term view.

They are looking at juicing the next quarter's earnings report and maybe one beyond for their own incentives. The cuts can definitely have a positive impact on near term profitability and margins.

Executives are less concerned about long term top line revenue, b/c who knows if they will be there and they are loaded up with massive equity incentivizing them to drive up the current price and cash in.

If Disney was a private company, none of this would be happening. You likely wouldn't own Pixar, Star Wars, or Marvel, but I'd still prefer it.
 

JackCH

Well-Known Member
WDW and Disneyland should be stand alone companies IMO the parks would be better off -Disney has gotten to big for it's own good
I think Tokyo is a proof of concept as to how Disney parks seem to be at their best when they are co-owned by someone else.

I'm not nearly as doom and gloom on the parks as most people here, but the cost-cutting and simultaneous price gouging drives me insane.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
Of course they would. Why wouldn’t they. Same amount of money with less cost.

I’m sure you’d rather work 4 hours a week at $1000/hour than work 40 hours at $100/hour.

Because the number of people in Group A could fit into a thimble compared with the large lake of people in Group B. You burn through your potential audience very quickly at the higher price because so few can afford it.

The work example is a false equivalency.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
I think Tokyo is a proof of concept as to how Disney parks seem to be at their best when they are co-owned by someone else.

I'm not nearly as doom and gloom on the parks as most people here, but the cost-cutting and simultaneous price gouging drives me insane.
OLC fully owns the Tokyo parks. They pay a royalty to TWDC for various rights.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom