Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
It was my understanding due to privacy concerns your employer it not allowed to know if the employee has been tested and what the result of the test is. I could be wrong.
COVID is different in that the risk for someone who chooses to play football is to themselves only (in normal, non-pandemic times). Not so with a highly contagious disease.Re: his comments on football, I would agree that he's stepping a bit outside his lane here. I think he can summarize the information as we know it and present risk scenarios. Others (policymakers, sports organizations, etc.) can then make decisions based on that risk information.
Of all sports, football is definitely not a zero-risk endeavor. The decision to play is based on an assumption of that risk and for those that choose to participate that the reward is worthwhile. In that way, Covid isn't different than a concussion or leg injury - it's a risk determination that needs to be made by the players/leagues.
I expect the parks to actually be a little easier to manage. There’s CM’s outside of all attractions already that should be able to keep an eye out. Springs a little more difficult due to its layout and mall feel.
It was my understanding due to privacy concerns your employer it not allowed to know if the employee has been tested and what the result of the test is. I could be wrong.
As he should. Families will be going back to Disney with the expectation that the new rules will be enforced in order to keep them safe and I don’t think they will. Either they will start once people start contracting the virus at Disney or the media starts to shine a spotlight on their lack of enforcement. Or they will close again.
Already have, during the largest part of the outbreak in March we only saw one story like , with no precautions or mask or social distancing taking place, only oneOnly a matter of time before we start seeing the "Family Member Dies from Coronavirus After Returning From Trip to Disneyworld" headlines.
The whole reason for that article was in the last sentence.So far I have only had time to skim the actual study so I don't want to give an opinion on it. I just wanted to comment once again on how journalism is dead. A quality journalist would have interviewed the author of the study to get insight and translation of the study for consumption by non-economists. Instead, this "journalist" just quoted and paraphrased a few things out of an 83 page study to get clicks and page views.
Basically, he plagiarized the work of the study's authors for personal gain. If I wrote that as an essay in college I would have gotten a D-.
Already have, during the largest part of the outbreak in March we only saw one story like , with no precautions or mask or social distancing taking place, only one
You now think people went out on Sunday to eat and then promptly got tested for something that has an incubation period longer than a few hours?
was anyone wearing masks, Half capacity, 6 feet temp checks etc etc
was anyone wearing masks, Half capacity, 6 feet temp checks etc etc
Largest part of the panic, maybe. Definitely not the outbreak.
Yes.. he does. As I said in another thread.. sometimes it feels like my head is on a lazysusan. Look it up young ones.
Sure maybe not the largest (imho I think it was In regards to people getting infected) but the point stands, either way we don’t really know, we weren’t really testing anyone. It is to far to think for such a highly contagious disease that everyone is touting now, and with asymptomatic spread, there weren’t thousands of cases in the parks before it closed. Everyone was being ‘careless’, obviously with not fault of their own.Largest part of the panic, maybe. Definitely not the outbreak.
was anyone wearing masks, Half capacity, 6 feet temp checks etc etc
What shows that? You're the one who made the ridiculous claim that the correlation between the spike and Father's Day is somehow relevant information.This shows how pointless that graphic is with that completely incorrect takeaway.
Nobody was unaware of the context.Not spin at all, just showing the facts behind all the panic/fear news. Everyone should have their own opinion but when contextless and incorrect information is being shared, it creates create unfounded fear. That is not a prudent way to tackle moving through a pandemic. And can do more harm than good. Are there things to be concerned about, yes but be concerned, posting sensational and in some cases wrong info does not help.
HOLY MOLY
do you know what that spike in the graphic posted shows? I am thinking not.What shows that? You're the one who made the ridiculous claim that the correlation between the spike and Father's Day is somehow relevant information.
Nobody was unaware of the context.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.