Weather_Lady
Well-Known Member
Our previous WDW trips have always been onsite stays. However, my family is a get-up-early-for-rope-drop, attraction-focused group, meaning the earlier access to Fastpasses, ability to use WDW transportation to conveniently get us to parks well before rope drop, and the opportunity to make use of EMH were always big motivators for us in staying onsite.
We plan to visit WDW at the end of August for 5 days/4 nights as the second leg of a combination trip with Universal, and originally booked an onsite room-and-ticket package with the "2 ticket days free" promotion. However, as we continue to educate ourselves on what WDW has to offer at present, it appears that all of the things that used to bring us onsite are gone. Due to unannounced early rope drops and truncated transportation hours, you can't rely on WDW transportation to get you to a park in time. There are no Fastpasses for anyone, and the start date for the EMH "early park entry" replacement hasn't been announced yet. Given what Disney just did with Ratatouille (deliberately holding it back so there's something "new" to offer on October 1st), I suspect they may do the same with early park entry.
DH and I were talking it over and are thinking that in light of these factors, it might be wise to plan a second, offsite trip option for the same dates (with components that can all be canceled up until a few days or weeks ahead of the trip) staying at a nearby AirBnB -- there are lovely 2-bedroom townhouses available at Fantasy World and other resorts, with private pools and resort amenities, for a fraction of what we'd pay for the onsite Disney hotel standard room -- and renting a car (which would also mean having to pay for parking at our Universal hotel, and at the Disney parks), and buying our tickets from Undercover Tourist.
We did the math and it looks like even with the added expense of a car rental and parking and loss of the "2 ticket days free" promotion, we still stand to save over $1,000 by staying offsite. So our plan is to keep the WDW reservation for now, book the offsite option as well, and then ask ourselves 30-60 days out from our travel dates (when we can cancel anything and everything penalty-free) whether there's any real value to staying onsite at that point. Does this plan make sense? Is there some disadvantage of an offsite stay -- other than loss of the ability to make dining reservations for the length-of-stay at 60 days -- that I'm missing? Is there anything unethical about booking two options when we only plan to keep one?
I welcome your thoughts. We had thought this trip would be our big "last night in the nursery" staying onsite, but I'm not sure that sentimental value alone is enough to justify the added expense of an onsite stay, especially if being onsite is actually going to hurt us, touring-wise.
We plan to visit WDW at the end of August for 5 days/4 nights as the second leg of a combination trip with Universal, and originally booked an onsite room-and-ticket package with the "2 ticket days free" promotion. However, as we continue to educate ourselves on what WDW has to offer at present, it appears that all of the things that used to bring us onsite are gone. Due to unannounced early rope drops and truncated transportation hours, you can't rely on WDW transportation to get you to a park in time. There are no Fastpasses for anyone, and the start date for the EMH "early park entry" replacement hasn't been announced yet. Given what Disney just did with Ratatouille (deliberately holding it back so there's something "new" to offer on October 1st), I suspect they may do the same with early park entry.
DH and I were talking it over and are thinking that in light of these factors, it might be wise to plan a second, offsite trip option for the same dates (with components that can all be canceled up until a few days or weeks ahead of the trip) staying at a nearby AirBnB -- there are lovely 2-bedroom townhouses available at Fantasy World and other resorts, with private pools and resort amenities, for a fraction of what we'd pay for the onsite Disney hotel standard room -- and renting a car (which would also mean having to pay for parking at our Universal hotel, and at the Disney parks), and buying our tickets from Undercover Tourist.
We did the math and it looks like even with the added expense of a car rental and parking and loss of the "2 ticket days free" promotion, we still stand to save over $1,000 by staying offsite. So our plan is to keep the WDW reservation for now, book the offsite option as well, and then ask ourselves 30-60 days out from our travel dates (when we can cancel anything and everything penalty-free) whether there's any real value to staying onsite at that point. Does this plan make sense? Is there some disadvantage of an offsite stay -- other than loss of the ability to make dining reservations for the length-of-stay at 60 days -- that I'm missing? Is there anything unethical about booking two options when we only plan to keep one?
I welcome your thoughts. We had thought this trip would be our big "last night in the nursery" staying onsite, but I'm not sure that sentimental value alone is enough to justify the added expense of an onsite stay, especially if being onsite is actually going to hurt us, touring-wise.
Last edited: