Attendance Figures 2003

[alice]

Originally posted by Pixie Duster
*sigh* I wish more people could understand Animal Kingdom, but it seems all people want are rides Gee who cares about seeing animals from all over the world, including ones that rarely seen, in a beautfiul environment. Oh well, at least intelligent people like it

NAHTAZU!!!!

 

[General Grizz]

Originally posted by kurros
Well, once has to remember M:S has only been open 3 months, and (up until the holidays) a slower time of the year. M:S helped visitor satisfaction no doubt, but I don't think it was really a surge after M:S opened, and that it was a steady improvement throughout the year.

Though maybe I underestimate Disney World fans.

I would like to see a month by month breakdown. . . that's an interesting point.

 

[CTXRover]

Originally posted by kurros
Well, once has to remember M:S has only been open 3 months, and (up until the holidays) a slower time of the year. M:S helped visitor satisfaction no doubt, but I don't think it was really a surge after M:S opened, and that it was a steady improvement throughout the year.

Though maybe I underestimate Disney World fans.

That is very true, but I'm sure it saw higher numbers over the summer as people like us and on other websites knew MS was testing on a near day to day basis by the end of June for at least few hours. So I'm sure there were people making special trips to Epcot even over the summer just to try MS. However, you are right that the real "public" push didn't start until October and if Epcot's improvement was year long that would be even better. It would be even better if Epcot was seeing better attendance in the beginning of the year even without MS. But I know for sure that I overheard people on more than one occasion over the time I was there (the last 2 weeks) who were heading back to Epcot just to do MS again. MS seems to in fact be really helping pull in the crowds and the motion sickness talk doesn't seem to have scared people away from it at all.

 

[brisem]

THe problem with this poll is it's easy to fix the numbers. All one park would have to do is have a mass number people rate the park and the that park's rating would go through the roof.

The poll isn't taking an accurrate sector of the people, such as Neilson and Roper. The only people voting is the people who know about the website.