Rumor Are the Simpsons moving from USF to DHS?

ohioguy

Well-Known Member
This is a continuously popular IP that has lasted well over 30 years. A fictional Springfield makes sense, especially given that the people who grew up on the Simpsons are the ones who have the money now. It fits DHS with zero problems, since they appear to be dividing the lands by IP and not overall, general theme.
 

peng

Well-Known Member
To be honest, this is one of those cases where I would want something more new. The Simpsons is something that's not been relevant in a while and the recent seasons haven't been good, despite what some video essays try to convince you (mostly talking about the SuperEyepatchWolf one which pretends the new seasons don't reference the old ones every 5 seconds). Wouldn't have minded if monsters came here or the old Zootopia rumor came true (which would probably cause most of the US's population of furries to make pilgrimages to HS), but the only reason its still there is that disney is too cheap to build new offices for the ones that are there.
 
can I point out a potential problem with this that hasn’t been brought up? The vast majority of voice actors are all in their seventies or will be by the time Universal loses the rights and Disney can even start building anything for them. Julie Kavner and Harry Shearer’s characters barely sound like they used to, Marge and Mr. burns most notably. Pamala Hayden just retired from the show. Are we just going to recast the entire cast for a ride and season 40?
 

Blobbles

Well-Known Member
I'll take Springfield if we get a full fledged production of STOP THE PLANET OF THE APES I WANT TO GET OFF apart of it.

"OH MY GOD! I WAS WRONG! IT WAS EARTH, ALL ALONG!"
Thats coming to the theatre in the wild at DAK. There will be fun facts about real monkeys shown before the show, so Disney can claim the park is still about animal preservation and appear as they are respecting rhode’s vision
 

Andrew25

Well-Known Member
Are The Simpsons as relevant as once before? No. Do they still make a boatload of merchandise and Food & Beverage sales? Yup.

I think some sort of Simpsons mini-land will work at DHS. I think the ol' Pixar Place street is perfect for them. It's a decent size and is out of the way of any major expansion. All you really need is enough space for merchandise sales and a few kiosks to sell those Pink donuts and a bar to sell Duff beer.
 

Moth

Well-Known Member
Unironically, there is a part of me that would be okay with a Futurama retheme of Tomorrowland...
Futurama isn't as... okay it's more mature than Simpsons, but there's just an element I can't really grasp that makes it more compatible with WDW than Simps?

Probably the fact it's more fantastical. More whimsy. More Zoidberg M&G Lightning Lanes.
 

Blobbles

Well-Known Member
Futurama isn't as... okay it's more mature than Simpsons, but there's just an element I can't really grasp that makes it more compatible with WDW than Simps?

Probably the fact it's more fantastical. More whimsy. More Zoidberg M&G Lightning Lanes.

There also is themed food in in slurp, but i don't know if anyone who ever watched the show would actually want to drink it…
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Simpsons is so completely off-brand for any Disney theme park...
So Disney owns it now...they own a ton of their own IP they let languish that could be producing....
But Simpsons if just wrong.... Especially since it has a history of being a Universal Theme park IP.
It would be a terrible idea.
If it’s a terrible idea, it’s probably going to happen!
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
The Simpsons fit as well in DHS has Cars does in the Magic Kingdom (let alone Frontierland).

That ship has long sailed. Enjoy the ride!
Yep. Nothing matters anymore. Guardians of the Galaxy and Moana in Future World. Cars in Frontierland. Encanto in Animal Kingdom. Simpsons in Hollywood Studios. They’ll just dump IP anywhere they can make the smallest of excuse it fits.

“It’s actually called Front-Tire Land!”
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
can I point out a potential problem with this that hasn’t been brought up? The vast majority of voice actors are all in their seventies or will be by the time Universal loses the rights and Disney can even start building anything for them. Julie Kavner and Harry Shearer’s characters barely sound like they used to, Marge and Mr. burns most notably. Pamala Hayden just retired from the show. Are we just going to recast the entire cast for a ride and season 40?

With the huge library of existing voice recordings and some AI you wouldn't need the voice actors.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
1732547190212.png
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Was Star Wars considered on brand in the 80s or was The Twilight Zone and Indiana Jones in the 90s?
Star Wars fit Tomorrowland, Indiana Jones fit Adventureland, and The Twilight Zone can really do anything so they wrote a Hollywood-themed script for it. They all made an effort to fit in.

Starlord going "Veggie Veggie Fruit Fruit" doesn't make the ride fit Epcot.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Star Wars fit Tomorrowland, Indiana Jones fit Adventureland, and The Twilight Zone can really do anything so they wrote a Hollywood-themed script for it. They all made an effort to fit in.

Starlord going "Veggie Veggie Fruit Fruit" doesn't make the ride fit Epcot.
Not to be that guy but Star Wars is in the distant past, not the future.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom