the.dreamfinder
Well-Known Member
I think they've learned from Sony too.Apple has laser focus on what it does, I don't see them wanting to be so diverse and bogged down with problems like espn.
I think they've learned from Sony too.Apple has laser focus on what it does, I don't see them wanting to be so diverse and bogged down with problems like espn.
I could think of much worse.Well that would be the end of my love for Disney and I know and awful amount of other people who would think the same. Worst possible thing that could happen.
They have enough money to buy Disney. Barely, but they do. Personnaly, I think I would be a positive move for both companies. Do I think it will happen? Not in the slightest.The 200 billion is very misleading as well. Due to all the complexities of their finances, it's a phantom number and not a disposable number. From some of the business reports that I've read, the real accessible number is between 50 and 80.
Any piece of news that certain people don't like is fake news in this day and age. Our world has literally devolved into what was addressed on the first episode of the Colbert Report.Fake news imo.
I am skeptical but if Apple can run Disney more competently than the Weatherman I guess they should go for it.
I don't know about that but the Jobs Estate is the largest individual stockholder in the company last I heard.Also, doesn't Steve Jobs wife sit on Disney's Board?
I can think of better fits for Apple. Such as Six Flags and Sea World.
Samsung is a better fit for that. Disney and Apple are both the leaders and premium products in their fields. Check that again..
No ones touching Sea World after what happened with Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus.I can think of better fits for Apple. Such as Six Flags and Sea World.
I think this is worth a thread if nothing more than to speculate about whether or not the parks would be in a better or worse off position with Apple at the helm.
Personally, I can't imagine that this would be a positive move for Disney purists like many of us. I love Apple's products but I worry about what new ownership would mean for preserving whatever nostalgia-conjuring attractions remain.
While true that most of Apple's cash is offshore, it could be coming onshore very soon. With the replacement of Obamacare failing today, the next item on the agenda is tax reform and a 10% tax on cash repatriation is a very real possibility.First off, most of that 200 billion is off-shore, so they wouldn't be able to use any of that for a purchase of an American company. I think these analysts all need to take a long walk off a short pier, as the majority are just full of it. This ain't ever happening.
That's completely false under a revised tax plan. Apple really does have $231b cash overseas and can bring it back, but won't because the current tax code would burden them with a 35% tax. They issue bonds to fund their capital return program and the cash is used as sort of collateral, but that could easily be reassigned and absorbed by future earning power. AAPL makes $50b/yr in profit.The 200 billion is very misleading as well. Due to all the complexities of their finances, it's a phantom number and not a disposable number. From some of the business reports that I've read, the real accessible number is between 50 and 80.
Although the chances of this happening are slim, it would be interesting to see if there would be any changes in the amount of theme park investment.
No ones touching Sea World after what happened with Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus.
You really think any company wants PETA on their .How are Sea World and Ringling connected? I know one is in trouble for treatment of the Orcas and the other for Elephants, but didnt know they were connected on a business level.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.