Yes, but once they open that door more can come later. Disney already had touted some pretty risque animation with Jessica Rabbit. And theres the site thats got some animated film segments with suggestive hidden items the animators snuck in.
Roger Rabbit was a Touchstone Release again reflecting that they would not be releasing more "risque" content under the Disney banner, but under some other label.
It's been talked about in the past, but TWDC has a weird and branding issue because "Disney" could mean one of two distinct things: The Disney
brand of family friendly media (especially cartoons), parks, consumer products, etc. And separately the Disney
company a multinational media conglomerate which owns a bunch of different subsidiaries many of which are not necessarily family friendly/all ages.
Most of the time it's not a big deal because when you talk about "Disney" the context makes it obvious which one is being discussed. And the company mainly would be talked about from a financial standpoint. But the product Disney+ blurs the line - it has Disney branded stuff on it
in addition to other brands like Star Wars, Marvel, National Geographic, etc. But the "Disney" in Disney+ is referring to The Walt Disney Company more than the Disney brand/subsidiary. The issue is that the Disney brand is so strong that it makes sense to label the product with that; but it certainly makes for confusion as to what content specifically could or would be included on the service.
I've said before that it would make sense I think to rename the overall company to something else that helps to reduce the confusion (like name it Buena Vista Corporation or something). But I get why they wouldn't want to lose the well known name of the company.
