Tell me about it!! Thankfully, she is 9 and a half hours away, so I won't have to go break my own switch. I just get a nice stern talking to
Is that the actual time or is it just horribly estimated?
Tell me about it!! Thankfully, she is 9 and a half hours away, so I won't have to go break my own switch. I just get a nice stern talking to
I have gone to very few concerts where the opening act comes on at the time the ticket says. Usually there's at least a 30 minute gap... I've also gone to a number of concerts where the main act is sufficiently long as to not require an opening act (e.g. Bruce Springsteen). And again, the performance doesn't start at the time the that is on the ticket.The time on the ticket is typically when the opening act is set to take the stage, not when the headliner begins Nice try though
The time on the ticket is typically when the opening act is set to take the stage, not when the headliner begins Nice try though
What would be considered a "normal" incorrectly posted wait time?
π minutes would be a normal number of minutes that would certainly be incorrectly determined in any record keeping system rounded to the nearest minute.
You're welcome.
Alot of these threads seem to get derailed when the conversation starts to become less than civil, and people start to let their emotions get the best of them. I'm sure the thread will wander back on topic....eventually.Remember when this thread was still on-topic?
I don’t.
Even the concerts where there is only the main act Springsteen & James Taylor (who I've seen 34 times...), they NEVER start on time...I think it falls into that "fashionably late" category LOLDepends on what the wait time is to get through South Carolina
I guess I have been lucky the last few concerts I have been too that when the ticket says 7:30pm, someone is performing at 7:30pm. Only an fool thinks the main act comes on at the specified time, especially if it is known beforehand there is an opener.
Sorry to ruin your day by spending a few more minutes reading...Alot of these threads seem to get derailed when the conversation starts to become less than civil, and people start to let their emotions get the best of them. I'm sure the thread will wander back on topic....eventually.
Wait -- I thought π was irrational...? So the thread title would have to be changed to reflect that...π minutes would be a normal number of minutes that would certainly be incorrectly determined in any record keeping system rounded to the nearest minute.
You're welcome.
Wait -- I thought π was irrational...? So the thread title would have to be changed to reflect that...
It's normally irrational. And transcendental. And... WRONG!!
We should all be using Tau.
I've just come from back from Paris which was unusually crowded for this time of year with waits ranging from 10 to 45 minutes at most (usually 5 to 10 at most) which was a drag but looking at the current WDW wait times..
View attachment 327088
View attachment 327089
How is this fun? I’d hope these were wrong lol
Doesn’t ruin my day, doesn’t really bother me at all-just stating an observation. Some of these redirected conversations can be good for a laugh, but when you get 10 pages or more of people arguing back and forth, it gets old after a bit. Usually I just skip forward in the thread, past the bickering, unless, like I said, the argument is funny/interesting.Sorry to ruin your day by spending a few more minutes reading...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.