Evilgidgit
Well-Known Member
As in Mickey and friends can appear in just about any setting or period, whilst Pinocchio is more tied to his Italian setting.Are you saying that Mickey and the gang are not grounded in reality?
As in Mickey and friends can appear in just about any setting or period, whilst Pinocchio is more tied to his Italian setting.Are you saying that Mickey and the gang are not grounded in reality?
As in Mickey and friends can appear in just about any setting or period, whilst Pinocchio is more tied to his Italian setting.
So then Mickey and the gang are not tied to reality, right? If that's the case, why is there a Toontown in Disneyland? Or a Mickey ride at the Studios (soon to be at Disneyland)? Those seem tied to a single setting to me.
Mickey and co. are less tied to a particular time or setting, and are more prone to being featured in different periods and locations, whilst as you said, Pinocchio is more closely tied to his Italian setting. Frankly, Storybook Circus could probably be its own land despite its small size as it is thematically different enough from New Fantasyland. Whether or not you decide to put a Pinocchio attraction of any kind within the circus is up to you and what is necessary to warrant its inclusion, what type of attraction it should be, and what story to tell.
You'd have to definitely retheme Village Haus. If Pinocchio was getting his own land or even just an attraction somewhere else in the park.
As is, Rapunzel and Snow White fit the German appearance. But I'm sure they could easily change it to something else. Like what they did over in Disneyland, but hopefully with a bigger budget.
Why would the Village Haus need a retheme if the ride isn't going near it? Does the ride have to connect to the restaurant?
It would feel really strange to have a Pinocchio restaurant no where near the attraction or land. That would be like Disney keeping Pizza Planet in Grand Avenue even though they have Toy Story Land.
That's not true. There are many examples of matching things that are nowhere near each other. For example, Alien Pizza Planet in Disneyland's Tomorrowland is nowhere near the Buzz Lightyear ride, nor is Star Tours (either in Disneyland or the Studios) anywhere near Galaxy's Edge.
While on the subject of Buzz Lightyear, you would think they would put the Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story Land and not Tomorrowland, but they didn't. Several resorts have a Buzz Lightyear ride and a Toy Story Land, sometimes in the same park, and yet they are nowhere near close to each other. And then there's the Peter Pan flight simulator deal being added to Tokyo DisneySea, even though the Peter Pan ride in Tokyo Disneyland is not going anywhere, as far as I know.
Speaking of, Disneyland once had and Disneyland Paris still does have Captain Hook's pirate ship and Skull Rock as explorable places, but they were/are nowhere near the Peter Pan ride in either park.
And let's not forget the Little Mermaid stage/puppet show at the Studios, even though there is a dark ride in the Magic Kingdom.
One last example: Goofy's Sky School, which should be in Mickey's Toontown, it seems, is instead in the Paradise Pier/Park area of the CA Adventure.
Anyway, I think I've made my point. You may think it's strange, but it's actually pretty common. And what's more, I'm not interested in doing a whole land for Pinocchio, just one ride, and not even a major E-ticket ride at that. Maybe a C-ticket, D tops.
Wrong, Buzz Lightyear is in a different park than Toy Story Land. So it falls under different rules than Pinocchio. In fact many IP's have different rides and shows throughout Disney World like Finding Nemo, which is at both Epcot and Animal Kingdom. Frozen, which is at Epcot and Hollywood Studios. And Beauty and the Beast and The Little Mermaid, which are both in Hollywood and Magic.
Star Tours and Galaxy's Edge are both Star Wars, but different parts of the series. But even though they are different parts, both still do feel a bit strange being in different areas. This is why many fans of come up with ideas to connect them. Star Tours is also a remnant of the past version of Hollywood. Before Galaxy's Edge was even a dream in some imagineers' little minds. It is also an expensive attraction and not a quick service like Pinocchio's Village Haus. So getting rid of it or moving it would be expensive as well.
Pinocchio has always been associated with the circus/funfair/theatre aesthetic, as seen in his dark ride, in parades and shows, etc. Placing Geppetto's workshop in a circus would make no sense. The Disney attractions tend to present what could be considered alternate takes on the films, or at a point where the characters exist before or after their happy endings. Pinocchio would likely be a puppet as that is how most people recognise him or visually imagine him. It would be a bit contradictory setting an attraction after the film's ending, as it would neutralise Pinocchio's happy ending by turning him back into a puppet. Frozen Ever After and Splash Mountain 2.0 follow the "set after the film" narrative, but that can't really be done with Pinocchio, since the character undergoes a life changing transformation.
The only other place where a ride MIGHT go is over where the bathrooms are near the Village Haus, but that's a problem because it's right close by to the entrance to the all-important Utilidors, as seen on Google Maps.
Yep, that's the area I said in the other thread. There's plenty of space and it doesn't have to fit into a section it may not belong. I don't think the utilidors matter much either because it's mostly wide open.
I tried fitting, say, a copy of the swinging balloons (like Emotional Whirlwind) over there, but even that requires a decent-sized footprint that, in this case, is too big for this space. You have to take the queue, which here would be themed to Geppetto's workshop, into account, as well as the ride mechanism. It just seems too small of a space for back there.
Unlike a lot of people here, I try to be ultrarealistic and not just pure blue sky.
You could always change what type of ride you are doing. One that would probably fit with the aesthetic of Fantasyland better.
If not, there's always the option of just over the tracks. Like what they've done for Toontown and Galaxy's Edge in Disneyland. The Tron ride is even on the other side of the tracks in Disney World as well.
Unlike a lot of people here, I don't believe in conforming the surrounding area to my ideas if it's just like Roller Coaster Tycoon. I try to take reality into account. You really think it's so easy to deal with the railroad tracks? I prefer to work within logistics than just be pure blue sky, as you seem to be suggesting. Are you suggesting that I should just ignore logistics and just go pure blue sky?
Anyway, another idea I've had was to do a caterpillar-style spinning ride like Scuttle's Scooters (at Tokyo DisneySea) or the Slinky Dog Zigzag Spin (at Disney Studios Paris and Hong Kong Disneyland), which does not take up a lot of space at all, and in fact seems really tiny if placed over at the Speedway. Even the spinning balloon ride may be a bit small for the Speedway's footprint (i.e., it can fit right in with one or two attractions). I've thought of maybe theming the balloons to look like Stromboli's puppets, with Pinocchio in the center. Or maybe it could be a swing ride like the Silly Symphony Swings.
As for the caterpillar-style spinning ride, maybe that could fit in the bathroom area near the Village Haus, but that might be a tight fit, particularly with the load area, which would be entirely enclosed, as it would be themed to Geppetto's workshop. Here's a sample image with Scuttle's Scooters in the area. Obviously, however, it would require a roof:
I'm also not sure if it's smart to put the ride so close to the Village Haus, as it can effectively give the teacups a run for its money in terms of making people sick right after eating, as some may do here. The ride space is small, but it can pack a punch.
In any case, that's pretty much all that can fit back there. Of course, with the Pinocchio ride now being put someplace else besides the Speedway, it leaves the question of what to do with the Speedway.
You're not being realistic though. Nobody wants just a spinning ride where the Speedway is or anywhere else. Unless it is the 3rd ride in a land (like Alien Swirling Saucers) and people are getting much better rides with it.
If they wanted to Disney could build a ramp or bridge over the tracks. They should know how to do it, they've been building them for over 65 years. Anyways It's a better idea than putting Pinocchio in the middle of Tomorrowland.
If not those then you can go with my idea. "Pinocchio's Daring Journey" could fit in back of "Small World", with the queue replacing the restrooms.
P.S. .... And stop acting like you're better than everyone else because you're definitely not.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.