Yes but more dramatic this time around. Good luck if you’re visiting Presidents Weekend!Fairly typically measures this time of year.
Probably not a Good Preview for Spring Break/Easter........Yes but more dramatic this time around. Good luck if you’re visiting Presidents Weekend!
We'll see what measures they take, but this time last year I didn't see any significant changes. Outside of early park closures (like DAK at 6 or MK at 9), anything else will be out of the ordinary from the past few years (like shorter hours for The Seas at Epcot).Fairly typically measures this time of year.
We'll see what measures they take, but this time last year I didn't see any significant changes. Outside of early park closures (like DAK at 6 or MK at 9), anything else will be out of the ordinary from the past few years (like shorter hours for The Seas at Epcot).
Impossible! We’ve been told the Parks revenues and profits have never been higher, and now that D+ is flush with cash, profits, and sustainable growth the era of Parks stagnation should be over right?Heard from multiple people that all areas of WDW are being asked to cut costs effective across the first few months of 2025. Not sure exactly how these will show up, but expect the usual like reduced hours, and labor cuts.
Yes I’ve heard similar.any insight @wdwmagic ??
What more is there to cut? They cut so much crap everything already feels like the bare minimum someone has to tell these executives to wake up.Heard from multiple people that all areas of WDW are being asked to cut costs effective across the first few months of 2025. Not sure exactly how these will show up, but expect the usual like reduced hours, and labor cuts.
All for a stupid stock price...
When will stockholders and the rich realize they would actually benefit from investment in the parks and not cuts??
Has over-investment ever killed a park or a project? Sure! But have cuts ever improved visitation numbers? No.
The obsession with per-guest spending is a direct result of the cuts, you need to find the money for the revenue sheets somewhere and that's where it will come from.
It genuinely feels like Disney would rather have 10 people spend $100 million on one vacation each rather than a million people spend $1,000 each which is absurd
They absolutely would. You’re taking in the same amount of money, but to cater to a million people you need way more restaurants and shops and cast members and longer hours than you do to cater to 10 people.All for a stupid stock price...
When will stockholders and the rich realize they would actually benefit from investment in the parks and not cuts??
Has over-investment ever killed a park or a project? Sure! But have cuts ever improved visitation numbers? No.
The obsession with per-guest spending is a direct result of the cuts, you need to find the money for the revenue sheets somewhere and that's where it will come from.
It genuinely feels like Disney would rather have 10 people spend $100 million on one vacation each rather than a million people spend $1,000 each which is absurd
Of course they would. Why wouldn’t they. Same amount of money with less cost..
It genuinely feels like Disney would rather have 10 people spend $100 million on one vacation each rather than a million people spend $1,000 each which is absurd
Because they narrow the scope of their appeal. Walt wanted the masses, not the best businessman but he had heart.Of course they would. Why wouldn’t they. Same amount of money with less cost.
I’m sure you’d rather work 4 hours a week at $1000/hour than work 40 hours at $100/hour.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.