Walt Disney – A Magical Life

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
Just like how the Country Bears switch around mid-show.
Random question- do we know how fast it takes a CBJ turntable to rotate? I know the acts are typically spaced out so either side of a turntable isn’t immediately after one another, but I’ve always wondered if it’d be possible for them to use Ernest in a finale and then turn it around fast enough to get Big Al interrupting at the end.
 

Charlie The Chatbox Ghost

Well-Known Member
I caught Bob at the park the day before the anniversary. He was very polite as I tried-but-failed to not be the awkward fanboi in his presence (probably a good idea in retrospect that the last time I was at Scary Farm I saw Tony Baxter sitting on a bench, but decided to just let him be with his group rather than Say Something). He's such a gem.
Before I saw the post you were quoting I thought you were talking about a different Bob, lmao
 

chadwpalm

Well-Known Member
In the Parks
No
Saw the show today, 3rd row. Overall the show is great, very well done. Yes, Bob Iger narrates and the face is off, but once he starts moving and talking you really just look past that. I didn't watch any videos ahead of time, so I didn't go in with expectations on his audio, but he sounded totally fine to me. It sounded like it was based off a recording of course, but it didn't sound choppy or edited or AI or too fast or too slow. Sounded fine to me.

With all of the facial articulation I figure they did their best to fit all the components in his head and that's why it seems a bit fatter than the real Walt.
 

Parteecia

Well-Known Member
3rd row, left side, walked in as the lights were going down.

Iger sounded like a bland generic narrator.

I still saw some pillow guy but it was mostly a mediocre version of Walt's face to me. I did enjoy watching him move and his facial expressions.

I think it ends weakly. His last statement doesn't stand out like a climax worthy of a big finish (compare Lincoln's ringing words).

But it sure was nice and cool in there.
 

Too Many Hats

Well-Known Member
First impression:

The attraction is underwhelming. If the objective is to inform the uninitiated about Walt's life and achievements, the film does a decent enough job, but curiously forgoes spelling out milestones such as "first cartoon with synchronized sound" or "first feature-length animated film" in favor of insipid, unenlightening repetitions that "Walt never gave up." Okay.

The AA doesn't really look like Walt. The face is bloated and cartoon-like. This alone calls into question the attraction's raison d'être. The AA is probably impressive, but its shortcomings in appearance and audio distract from any groundbreaking qualities it may have. The general public's mileage may vary.

Beyond the AA itself, the Walt AA scene as a whole feels like a missed opportunity. There is almost no transition from the film to the scene; the curtain simply raises and Walt appears (contrast this with Lincoln's dramatic introduction in Great Moments). The scene itself is pretty brief. The set is smaller than I expected and not particularly impressive or interesting. The dialogue chosen for Walt is not exactly the most profound thing he ever said (will guests appreciate Walt's sentiments about his mailman brother or find it condescending?). And then the scene just kind of ends.

The lobby exhibit is delightful and will introduce casual guests to the idea of concept art, audio-animatronics, and the evolution of Disneyland. The exit hallway mural is a gaudy downgrade.

In light of Walt's alleged instruction to Blaine Gibson regarding building an AA in his likeness, this attraction doesn't exactly justify violating the founder's wishes. I don't particularly care for it but I hope other guests enjoy the attraction and find it informative.
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
First impression:

The attraction is underwhelming. If the objective is to inform the uninitiated about Walt's life and achievements, the film does a decent enough job, but curiously forgoes spelling out milestones such as "first cartoon with synchronized sound" or "first feature-length animated film" in favor of insipid, unenlightening repetitions that "Walt never gave up." Okay.

The AA doesn't really look like Walt. The face is bloated and cartoon-like. This alone calls into question the attraction's raison d'être. The AA is probably impressive, but its shortcomings in appearance and audio distract from any groundbreaking qualities it may have. The general public's mileage may vary.

Beyond the AA itself, the Walt AA scene as a whole feels like a missed opportunity. There is almost no transition from the film to the scene; the curtain simply raises and Walt appears (contrast this with Lincoln's dramatic introduction in Great Moments). The scene itself is pretty brief. The set is smaller than I expected and not particularly impressive or interesting. The dialogue chosen for Walt is not exactly the most profound thing he ever said (will guests appreciate Walt's sentiments about his mailman brother or find it condescending?). And then the scene just kind of ends.

The lobby exhibit is delightful and will introduce casual guests to the idea of concept art, audio-animatronics, and the evolution of Disneyland. The exit hallway mural is a gaudy downgrade.

In light of Walt's alleged instruction to Blaine Gibson regarding building an AA in his likeness, this attraction doesn't exactly justify violating the founder's wishes. I don't particularly care for it but I hope other guests enjoy the attraction and find it informative.
You know what's ironic...Without the Walt AA added...The movie your watching that was redubbed with Iger instead of Julie Andrew's Is something you may have seen at DHS already..
GdZ_FIlXIAAAmbk
 

Too Many Hats

Well-Known Member
You know what's ironic...Without the Walt AA added...The movie your watching that was redubbed with Iger instead of Julie Andrew's Is something you may have seen at DHS already..
GdZ_FIlXIAAAmbk

Yeah, I was vaguely aware of this. I must have seen it at “MGM” back in 2005. But I’m assessing Walt Disney - A Magical Life as most guests will: as a new experience at Disneyland.
 

PiratesMansion

Well-Known Member
First impression:

The attraction is underwhelming. If the objective is to inform the uninitiated about Walt's life and achievements, the film does a decent enough job, but curiously forgoes spelling out milestones such as "first cartoon with synchronized sound" or "first feature-length animated film" in favor of insipid, unenlightening repetitions that "Walt never gave up." Okay.

The AA doesn't really look like Walt. The face is bloated and cartoon-like. This alone calls into question the attraction's raison d'être. The AA is probably impressive, but its shortcomings in appearance and audio distract from any groundbreaking qualities it may have. The general public's mileage may vary.

Beyond the AA itself, the Walt AA scene as a whole feels like a missed opportunity. There is almost no transition from the film to the scene; the curtain simply raises and Walt appears (contrast this with Lincoln's dramatic introduction in Great Moments). The scene itself is pretty brief. The set is smaller than I expected and not particularly impressive or interesting. The dialogue chosen for Walt is not exactly the most profound thing he ever said (will guests appreciate Walt's sentiments about his mailman brother or find it condescending?). And then the scene just kind of ends.

The lobby exhibit is delightful and will introduce casual guests to the idea of concept art, audio-animatronics, and the evolution of Disneyland. The exit hallway mural is a gaudy downgrade.

In light of Walt's alleged instruction to Blaine Gibson regarding building an AA in his likeness, this attraction doesn't exactly justify violating the founder's wishes. I don't particularly care for it but I hope other guests enjoy the attraction and find it informative.
Do you think they're actually working on the attraction after 8 PM when the attraction closes or just taking advantage of the cost savings from not running it?
 

Too Many Hats

Well-Known Member
Do you think they're actually working on the attraction after 8 PM when the attraction closes or just taking advantage of the cost savings from not running it?

Is there evidence (or credible rumors) they're working on the attraction? Not trying to be cynical but I'd just assume the latter. I wonder what kind of post-8pm attendance they're projecting. I saw the show twice yesterday; it was pretty packed at 4pm and very dead by 7pm.
 

Figments Friend

Well-Known Member
You know what's ironic...Without the Walt AA added...The movie your watching that was redubbed with Iger instead of Julie Andrew's Is something you may have seen at DHS already..
GdZ_FIlXIAAAmbk

I would really like to know why Julie Andrews’ original narration was not used for this at Disneyland.
Just use the film as is, why change the narration…?

Julie brings an elegance and a class to the presentation, and also she is justified in doing so since she actually knew and worked with Walt.
Seems to me a perfect fit for a presentation such as this themed to Uncle Walt.
Makes perfect sense to have her narration remain.
So why change it…?

I would really like to know who made the decision to record a new narration, and use Bob Iger.

-
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
I would really like to know who made the decision to record a new narration, and use Bob Iger.

Eisner was the original narrator of One Man's Dream. Julie Andrews became his replacement after he left the company.

Perhaps the idea was to replicate that with one head of the company talking about its founder?

Or maybe Iger wanted to be associated with what may have been perceived as a prestige, technically complex project?
 

Figments Friend

Well-Known Member
Eisner was the original narrator of One Man's Dream. Julie Andrews became his replacement after he left the company.

Perhaps the idea was to replicate that with one head of the company talking about its founder?

Or maybe Iger wanted to be associated with what may have been perceived as a prestige, technically complex project?

True, and I had forgotten about Michael’s original narration.
Julie’s is just so stellar the previous version has already been erased from my mind…and Eisner did it just fine as well.

Valid points.


-
 

Cmdr_Crimson

Well-Known Member
I would really like to know why Julie Andrews’ original narration was not used for this at Disneyland.
Just use the film as is, why change the narration…?

Julie brings an elegance and a class to the presentation, and also she is justified in doing so since she actually knew and worked with Walt.
Seems to me a perfect fit for a presentation such as this themed to Uncle Walt.
Makes perfect sense to have her narration remain.
So why change it…?

I would really like to know who made the decision to record a new narration, and use Bob Iger.

-
Probably him for his final bow before he leaves? 🤷‍♂️.

The only thing we see of anything Eisner related are just photos or plaques with his name around the resort..At least he had fun during his role trying to be a Walt-esque host when he would open the Magical world of Disney or when they had him In the park tour... Who else can make Chernabog stop him in his tracks..


I'm sure Iger would just be very stoic and everyone would have to be quiet behind him going into the theater..
 

mickEblu

Well-Known Member
Saw this show on Sunday. It helped that I got to see the AA and hear his voice beforehand on videos. My expectations were in check and the AA’s likeness or lack thereof wasn’t as jarring. I sat front row dead center. Last show of the night. Luckily I looked at my phone while we were shopping at the Emporium at 7:50pm.

So the One Man’s Dream portion was fine. I think I expected it to be a little better. Seemed a little lackluster and a bit dated but it does the job. Bob Iger’s narration is terrible and his voice has no business being on this show. Thankfully, you don’t hear him very often. Walt is much more present.

I will admit when the curtains moved and I saw the Walt AA for the first time I did get emotional for a couple seconds. The AA moves really well. I think they ve worked on his face a little bit so that helps too. Between the supposed tweaks to his face and that I have gotten used to the fact that what we got is what an AA representation of Walt looks like (for now) helped. Same thing went for his voice. Didn’t particularly sound like him but it wasn’t so bad that it became a distraction. The AA portion is very short. Between all the clips I heard it felt like I had seen most of, if not the whole animatronic portion of the show.

All said I left the show satisfied. Not amazed but satisfied. I think, even with its flaws, it accomplished what it set out to do emotionally. It’s a nice tribute to Walt Disney at his park. It belongs there. Hopefully they fine tune it a bit. Get rid of Bob Iger, work on his face and work on the audio. I won’t be running back to see it anytime soon especially with my usual party that includes two children. Not that my 9 year old son didn't enjoy it but I doubt he’d be up for another viewing anytime soon.

Almost forgot… I think having the CM give the disclaimer about the audio is tacky and unnecessary.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom