DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
I still strongly believe we’re gonna get Paris’ Lion King ride before this investment cycle is over

Definitely could see it for part of the 2nd 5 years

If they add that and a 3rd attraction ion to Pandora, both of which could also run at night, really could flesh out the park and allow for later closings and spread people out from the other parks more
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
I think it would fill out the land and could be based on one of the new movies. Expand the land with that and a table service restaurant and it would be great
i Don’t know. That doesn’t really sound appealing to me. But I don’t like avatar the movie so maybe that’s why it doesn’t sound appealing to me. I think expansion money would be better spent elsewhere.
 
Last edited:

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
i Don’t know. That doesn’t really sound appealing to me. But I don’t like avatar the movie so maybe that’s why it doesn’t sound appealing to me. I just expansion money would be better spent elsewhere.

There is also an expansion pad there and were plans for a 3rd attraction to start with so would be easier / cheaper (theoretically) than other options for expansion

I just think the land is so well done and would welcome more of it. I'm not a Avatar super fan or anything but do enjoy the movies
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
There is also an expansion pad there and were plans for a 3rd attraction to start with so would be easier / cheaper (theoretically) than other options for expansion

I just think the land is so well done and would welcome more of it. I'm not a Avatar super fan or anything but do enjoy the movies
I agree. The land is very well done. But isn’t that expansion pad where the lion king ride is (was?) rumored to go?
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
Human biases are impossible to avoid in any form of surveying, however, what is suggested here is incredibly off from reality

Really?

DCL survey 32.png


I had a different question on a different survey, 1-5 scale, where 5 was “huge fan”, 1 was “not a fan at all”, and 2-4 were blank. And 5 is on the left, where your eyes are going to go first.

Cognitive psychology reveals that the way questions are framed affects how respondents interpret and answer them. For instance, leading questions can manipulate participants into confirming biases, while loaded terms may elicit emotional responses that skew data integrity.

Sending surveys that at least used to expire within 48 hours of your visit isn’t trying to elicit an emotional response?

Claiming Disney doesn’t word many of their survey questions to get a desired response is naive, at best.
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
Really?

View attachment 847645

I had a different question on a different survey, 1-5 scale, where 5 was “huge fan”, 1 was “not a fan at all”, and 2-4 were blank. And 5 is on the left, where your eyes are going to go first.



Sending surveys that at least used to expire within 48 hours of your visit isn’t trying to elicit an emotional response?

Claiming Disney doesn’t word many of their survey questions to get a desired response is naive, at best.
Bias in surveys is literally a field of study. Denying reality doesn't mean it is any less true. It happens everywhere, and it is especially egregious from Disney.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
Do we really need a third avatar attraction? Don’t get me wrong the existing attractions are really good but I don’t see the need for a third one.

We absolutely do. One reason is because that part of the park is fairly isolated and having only two attractions there generally leads to people automatically waiting for both because they've made the effort to go there and it is annoying to cycle back. And that is a big contributor to the long waits and subsequent disappointment for folks with NRJ.

NRJ needs to be the filler third attraction in Pandora, not a second one which needs to hold its weight.

Now I think a high quality walk through with AAs could potentially work as a third attraction in Pandora, especially as that would essentially be a walk on/anytime type experience. But the area would really benefit from another ride and the one going into DCA seems like it would be great to compliment DAK's offerings.
 

doctornick

Well-Known Member
The LK ride, a 3rd Avatar attraction PLUS a nighttime show would make AK pretty close to perfect IMHO

I'd love it, but probably hoping for too much. But the park needs at least one more ride (especially an indoor, less intense one that won't shut down due to weather) after what is already announced so I'M hoping DAK gets at least the TLK or Pandora ride at some point in the near future in addition to the return of a nighttime show.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
We absolutely do. One reason is because that part of the park is fairly isolated and having only two attractions there generally leads to people automatically waiting for both because they've made the effort to go there and it is annoying to cycle back. And that is a big contributor to the long waits and subsequent disappointment for folks with NRJ.

NRJ needs to be the filler third attraction in Pandora, not a second one which needs to hold its weight.

Now I think a high quality walk through with AAs could potentially work as a third attraction in Pandora, especially as that would essentially be a walk on/anytime type experience. But the area would really benefit from another ride and the one going into DCA seems like it would be great to compliment DAK's offerings.
I definitely don’t want them to clone the ride from California. If they use that ride system here they should use it for Moana.
 

SplashJacket

Well-Known Member
Really?

View attachment 847645

I had a different question on a different survey, 1-5 scale, where 5 was “huge fan”, 1 was “not a fan at all”, and 2-4 were blank. And 5 is on the left, where your eyes are going to go first.
I don’t understand what your issue with this survey is. Left to right? If it was right to left you’d complain it’s the last thing they read so they’d click it first.

Secondly, as far as I’m aware, most applications of these surveys consider anything below “Excellent” to be a failure, so having 3 positive options isn’t 3 chances for these surveys to “succeed” it’s 2 options to miss the mark and 2 options to fail, and 1 option to pass.
Sending surveys that at least used to expire within 48 hours of your visit isn’t trying to elicit an emotional response?
You’d rather people answer surveys about super specific details (bathroom amenities, shows, lounges, etc.) after a couple months when they forgot it? Two months later you’re probably not going to remember a random soap smelled bad, but you’ll remember that you liked the food at a restaurant, but was it day 2 or 6? You don’t remember because it’s two months later.

Secondly, if you do multiple days at Magic, you want to be surveyed shortly after that specific visit, because a second visit might have a separate level of staffing, attendance, etc. or if they’re running a test, you might respond about one day when the survey is tied to another day.

Of course there’s limitations in surveying, but it’s naive to suggest your alternative captures (or is attempting to capture) the same thing.
Claiming Disney doesn’t word many of their survey questions to get a desired response is naive, at best.
The people creating surveys and people requesting surveys are two different groups. As I said before, there are biases that are inherently human and are hard to minimize, but there’s not a huge conspiracy about an exec wanting a survey to say one thing and then that survey gets created.

If a survey topic has an obvious answer, the surveyors bias is hard to minimize, so that obvious answer might lead to a skew in results from the provided options, but that’s human surveying limitations, not a grand conspiracy.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom