When you get into highly partisan judges like this the law is less important.There's still multiple criteria here. Disney could lose on the 1A grounds now but still win on the contracts clause. I honestly have a hard time seeing how any judge, short of a judge like Aileen Cannon, rules for the state on the contracts clause.
Sadly this is only really true for most judges appointed prior to 2013 when the filibuster was still in place in the Senate. Since then the Federal Judges appointed have been a lot more partisan and extreme. The old notion of Conservative judges is being wiped away over time. Just like Disney was highly likely to win the initial case with Walker in there they are highly likely to lose now. It is what it is. There will still be an appeal but no guarantee how that plays out.I don't think the Judge matters as much as the law and Constitition. Further, a Conservative strict constructionalist Judge will give the 1st Amendment issue more weight. Disney will win this case and it will be the downfall of DeSantis's Presidential run.
And cannon was roundly shot down by other Trump appointees. Trump himself has lost a number of cases to people he appointed.There's still multiple criteria here. Disney could lose on the 1A grounds now but still win on the contracts clause. I honestly have a hard time seeing how any judge, short of a judge like Aileen Cannon, rules for the state on the contracts clause.
That’s not the same thing as legislative intent that’s clearly available in the public record or during legislative debate. The article mentions lawmakers were being subpoenaed to be deposed to find out their intent as the public record was void of any details on the redistricting legislation.This judge seems to subscribe to the jdea that one should not read into legislative intent. https://www.wcjb.com/2023/05/26/florida-lawmakers-shielded-redistricting-legal-fight/
The amount of times in a year, I see a third degree relative is slim to none."A third degree relative".
But he fired a parting shot to the state in the way out.
The amount of times in a year, I see a third degree relative is slim to none.
It’s basic economics of supply and demand. Housing is always cheaper when there’s little demand. The more successful an area becomes the less affordable it gets. The market sets the prices. In those rural areas people would gladly take more when selling their homes but they aren’t getting the offers.
I’m not ignoring any of that. It’s part of the reality we live in. That’s why the government at all levels has made affordable housing a priority in urban areas to some extent. Disney and Universal have been involved in projects to build affordable housing for at least some of their workforce. That housing is usually apartment style vs single family homes. It’s also possible for people with lower paying service jobs to live in a single family home that’s affordable if they are willing to commute. I know places like FL have no real mass transit and commuting is more of a Northeast thing, but where do you think all the Manhattan McDonalds workers live? They commute and usually take mass transit to work.Your ignoring all the induced demand from people who never intend to actually live in the houses…… also ignoring the reality that all those successful areas still need lower paying service jobs yet those areas fight tooth and nail for any kind of affordable housing.
As if the state cares. They got what they wanted one way or the other. Turns out it was the other."A third degree relative".
But he fired a parting shot to the state in the way out.
The outcome depends highly on what they're partisan about though.When you get into highly partisan judges like this the law is less important.
His presidential run will be over long before this case is. That's not a knock against his chances as much as it is an assessment of the turtle's pace of the court system.Disney will win this case and it will be the downfall of DeSantis's Presidential run.
Yes. But a Trump appointee at the Federal level. So it's really still up in the air. Conservative leaning? Absolutely. Does that mean ruling in favor of the state and "removing government special privileges to a private corporation" or Disney and "less government coercion over corporations"? Both are conservative viewpoints.
It's crazy that outcomes are being theorized based not on the law, but what certain judges will do. Judges who are supposed to be impartial.
Way to blow it Harry!Sadly this is only really true for most judges appointed prior to 2013 when the filibuster was still in place in the Senate. Since then the Federal Judges appointed have been a lot more partisan and extreme. The old notion of Conservative judges is being wiped away over time. Just like Disney was highly likely to win the initial case with Walker in there they are highly likely to lose now. It is what it is. There will still be an appeal but no guarantee how that plays out.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.