Universal Epic Universe (South Expansion Complex) - Opens May 22 2025

andre85

Well-Known Member
And? Epic Universe was a blank slate that absolutely could have had the best version instead of a copy of something jammed into another park.

Why not build 30 versions of it then, since they have all that space?

I mean, they obviously have more space left, but I'm personally glad they're saving room for a future SNW expansion rather than duplicating an existing ride structure.
 

JT3000

Well-Known Member
Universal was under obligation to outdo Hagrid
Says who?

And? Epic Universe was a blank slate that absolutely could have had the best version instead of a copy of something jammed into another park.
Epic Universe was a blank slate that was always planned to have the same Nintendo land as Japan. Yes, it had space to work with, but what you two are asking for is a complete overhaul of both the ride's and land's designs, which they obviously didn't consider worthwhile, not to mention we would be waiting even longer for it to open here if they had to redesign it.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Says who?


Epic Universe was a blank slate that was always planned to have the same Nintendo land as Japan. Yes, it had space to work with, but what you two are asking for is a complete overhaul of both the ride's and land's designs, which they obviously didn't consider worthwhile, not to mention we would be waiting even longer for it to open here if they had to redesign it.
What a load of crock. So Universal can’t do things in a timely manner? They did for the minimal cost savings, that’s it.
 

SplashJacket

Well-Known Member
And I don’t think Stardust will be better than Velocicoaster. It’s rather surprising to have 5 new coaster tracks in this park but end up with IoA still having better coasters.

For me, a lot rides on the new Potter ride and Monsters Unchained.
Different goals. Stardust will easily be their best marginally themed coaster, and will have a super high capacity. Fits a need
 

JT3000

Well-Known Member
What a load of crock. So Universal can’t do things in a timely manner? They did for the minimal cost savings, that’s it.
It is not "a load of crock." Believe it or not, you can't redesign an entire ride & land overnight. The DK area would have been pushed back considerably had they taken this path, not to mention the potential impact on other, adjacent areas of the park. As the person who is always defending Disney's inability to construct a clone in a timely manner, because it supposedly required extra design work despite being a clone, I would expect you of all people to understand this.
 

TalkToEthan

Well-Known Member
, not to mention we would be waiting even longer for it to open here if they had to redesign it.

you just pulled that up out of thin air.

So when it comes to creating something monumental to the point of likely earthshaking within the theme park industry like the Ministry of Magic and Monsters—they open on time….
……but when it comes to creating a deluxe version of Donkey Kong from scratch somehow that project automatically messes with opening dates.

Ya, I don’t buy it
 

JT3000

Well-Known Member
you just pulled that up out of thin air.

So when it comes to creating something monumental to the point of likely earthshaking within the theme park industry like the Ministry of Magic and Monsters—they open on time….
……but when it comes to creating a deluxe version of Donkey Kong from scratch somehow that project automatically messes with opening dates.

Ya, I don’t buy it
You can't buy anything with Monopoly money. Why are the Ministry of Magic and Monsters assumed to be high-quality attractions? Because they were long planned to be exactly what they're rumored to be. They didn't say "screw it" and completely change the plans, utilizing the most rudimentary of Roller Coaster Tycoon logic, only after realizing their length or capacity could potentially be an issue, which is exactly what you're asking of them here. I'll say this one more time, since I guess you didn't catch it before: This land was always designed to be the same in both Orlando & Japan. Even before the Nintendo project was moved to Epic Universe from Universal Studios, the plan was always to mirror the experience in both locations, with only Hollywood getting a Cliff's Notes version due to its lack of real estate. This should come as a shock to absolutely no one given Universal's more recent propensity for cloning entire lands. So no, a "deluxe version" of Donkey Kong was never in the cards, and Epic Universe having more space than Japan never even entered into the equation. They built what they wanted to build.

Where are you getting this “overnight” stuff from????? Epic and its attractions have been in the works for 5+ years.

I'm getting it from you, of course. Do you know how many of the past five years (it's been much longer than that, btw) were spent fundamentally redesigning Donkey Kong? Zero. We knew exactly what sort of ride it would be that long ago, and Universal themselves even longer. You're asking them to reconsider the attraction's entire design in retrospect, ie at the last minute, because of what you deem to be design flaws (before even riding it, mind you.) So yes, you want them to reconsider their plans overnight, just because EU happens to have more space than Japan, only half a year from the park's opening. Guess what, it wouldn't be ready by then. This should all go without saying, but here we are.
 

TalkToEthan

Well-Known Member
r. You're asking them to reconsider the attraction's entire design in retrospect, ie at the last minute, because of what you deem to be design flaws
You’re wrong……I never made such a claim nor expected such an order change **after the fact**
Where are you getting that?? Not from me.

My position is it should have been originally designed to surpass Hagrid in scope and scale to raise the bar for coasters in the industry and it should have been designed to accommodate more throughput of course. If it would have taken 2 distinct tracks to do it then so be it—- whatever it takes to get it done.

You’re under some assumption that I think it should have been reworked when it should have been designed for something grand at the onset of Epic—-hence, why I said 5+ (plus)years
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
It is not "a load of crock." Believe it or not, you can't redesign an entire ride & land overnight. The DK area would have been pushed back considerably had they taken this path, not to mention the potential impact on other, adjacent areas of the park. As the person who is always defending Disney's inability to construct a clone in a timely manner, because it supposedly required extra design work despite being a clone, I would expect you of all people to understand this.
I do understand it which is how I understand it is a load of crock. You’re making the same bad assumption as people do about Disney, but worse because we have an entire park’s worth of context. No part of Super Nintendo World was a late, much less eleventh hour, addition to the opening lineup of Epic Universe. There was just as much time to design a site-specific land as there was for the other four lands.

The park will also open with a roller coaster attraction that was conceived, designed and redesigned at the eleventh hour.

You can't buy anything with Monopoly money. Why are the Ministry of Magic and Monsters assumed to be high-quality attractions? Because they were long planned to be exactly what they're rumored to be. They didn't say "screw it" and completely change the plans, utilizing the most rudimentary of Roller Coaster Tycoon logic, only after realizing their length or capacity could potentially be an issue, which is exactly what you're asking of them here.
Except that’s not the case. While the general idea of a Ministry of Magic attraction has been kicked around it was not at all a long planned singular vision. Just during its time as part of Epic Universe the attraction has been completely scrapped and reconceptualized multiple times. Not just moving scenes around, whole thing started again including the ride system being scrapped.

Even before the Nintendo project was moved to Epic Universe from Universal Studios, the plan was always to mirror the experience in both locations, with only Hollywood getting a Cliff's Notes version due to its lack of real estate.
This is part of the problem. They decided to do both to save a little money. That’s it. If it’s ridiculous for Disney to take so long and just do the same thing then Super Nintendo World is the poster child of that complaint. At the time it was even worse of a decision because Epic Universe had not yet been brought forward on the schedule to 2023 so there would have intentionally been even more time between the opening in Japan and the opening in Orlando.

And unlike Disney which paused construction for over a year, EU only paused a few months.
The park was paused for about a year.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Werewolf???

1731946084355.png
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom