News Disney Lakeshore Lodge (Project 89 - Development near Fort Wilderness)

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
Location next to the campground is annoying. It really doesn't fit in with that area as designed.
This was their chance to go with Wilderness Junction or Buffalo Junction etc , to tie into the area, but no, pave paradise and put in a city building block . Its disheartening, but that's what is to be expected of them now. No one is left in the guard that followed a fitting design plan.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
Disney-Nature-Resort_Full_60211.jpg

I'm very curious on floor count here. Reflections concept art would suggest these more built sections are about to have final floor topping off. Which seems ideal to me if it can stick to keep the building behind that tree-line.
 

Epcot82Guy

Well-Known Member
Based on the crane heights, I would guess there is a ways to go. The latest rumors I saw were 9 stories, I believe.

I really hope I'm wrong, as I agree with you. But, I don't think that's the plan, especially given current management.
 

WDWhopper

Active Member
I should have said it’s mostly concrete work. Some of it is pre-poured but steel and concrete is it right now. This is still a 2027 opening, don’t fall into the usual trap of “oh look, I see some things are moving quickly, it’s opening sooner!!”.
My point was, if Disney moved as quickly on the new attractions that they have planned as they are moving on this “capacity increaser,” then they might be in a better position to compete with epic universe over the next couple of years.
 

nickys

Premium Member
Disney builds DVC because they recoup the building costs almost immediately when they are finished. CASH cows. New attractions cost a lot and they don't recoup the cost as quickly plus DVC maintenance is payed by the DVC owner. Attractions Disney has to pay maintenance costs----all about the money
I don’t know how much of a resort’s points they need to sell to recoup their costs. What do you think is the magic percentage?

As a guide, Riviera had sold around 22% of points after 2 years, 76% after 4 years and is now around 86% sold.

My guess is they need to sell more than 50% at a minimum. And the operating costs are determined per point, so Disney is still on the hook for a significant proportion of the operating costs until the resort sells out. They cannot legally manipulate the maintenance fees to lessen their costs.
 

Jambo Dad

Well-Known Member
I still harbor at least a little hope for this resort. It has more room around it as a buffer than Island Tower and they are doing some good things, like a lazy river. Theme could be interesting in competent hands. However I will also say that we had a chance to walk Island Tower a couple months ago and it was very disappointing. It has ambitions to be calm, relaxing and sophisticated, but you really start feeling how how faux it all is. The site is too tight. The finishes are so bland it hurts your eyes. Every opportunity to inject color was avoided. The pretense of reflecting aspects of the Polynesian culture is a pale, cheap trinket imitation of Animal Kingdom and Wilderness. It is not a worthy companion to the original Poly.
 
Last edited:

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom