PintoColvig
Active Member
I actually have a problem with the way the minimum heights are set. The height is measured while a child is standing up but they won't be riding while standing up. He or she will be sitting down. That means that a 39" tall kid could be as tall as a 40" kid if both were sitting down.
This applied in my family. My daughter is almost two inches taller than her brother when standing up. But sitting down, his long torso makes him taller than his sister.
So here's my point, is it negligient to let a child ride an attraction who does not meet its minimum height if he or she is as tall while sitting down as a child who meets the minimum height standard? Is the first child less safe than the second?
Before you ask, I'll tell you. The shorter child in my family made it onto the same rides as his sister. And he was completely safe. If you don't agree, I don't care. :kiss:
This applied in my family. My daughter is almost two inches taller than her brother when standing up. But sitting down, his long torso makes him taller than his sister.
So here's my point, is it negligient to let a child ride an attraction who does not meet its minimum height if he or she is as tall while sitting down as a child who meets the minimum height standard? Is the first child less safe than the second?
Before you ask, I'll tell you. The shorter child in my family made it onto the same rides as his sister. And he was completely safe. If you don't agree, I don't care. :kiss: