It was an example. I'd happily take Starship. Night Ranger, Air Supply, or a number of others.
Boys II Men is one I've actually heard of, so they were on the 35% or so of names that I actively recognized (though I'm not able to name a song of theirs off the top of my head). Many others I might have heard a song once or twice from them but would have no idea who they are otherwise. If you're implying some kind of racial issue, you are sorely mistaken, rather it just tells you about my musical preferences (and is also an objective fact). Not a big fan of Latin music personally, and about 80% of my musical listening is roughly consisting of bands or artists who had some good level of popularity in the 1960s to 1980s, and musical theatre cast albums.
The last time Disney did a significant new offering that wasn't the Guardians show, happened to be the relatively expensive ($250 per night per musician) Pixar orchestra show, which was very much lauded by critics and the arts community in Orlando but was never sustainable. In this case, this kind of a show would never get past DLE today, mostly because they know the higher-ups would never approve it and they don't have full control over entertainment anymore. Impossible to back for money because it has no IP that can be monetized or synergized. Unfortunately.
Oh and you don't want to know how much Disney has to pay Equity actors. I've looked at some of their old agreements in the past and I don't think it is sustainable even with dinner sales.
Yep. Back in the day when Disney would spend good money for live entertainment. I'm convinced they have a roster of C/D level acts on retainer at this point because so many of them seem to repeat. Back in the 90s of course it was 60s and 70s bands (The Monkees allegedly almost caused a riot when they made an appearance one year), but even until fairly recently Disney was spending good money on getting bands with really good name recognition... Which is my primary complaint.
Live entertainment is really expensive. And while a good night time show, stage show, parade, or even fireworks, have been proven to generate significant revenues on paper for Disney in the past, big one-off concerts don't. (I'm sure Universal has different math than I do, otherwise they wouldn't do it, the same with Seaworld.) I have no financial data as to how much money Disney makes off of these dining packages, but I have to assume that they've started cutting back on the bigger acts because of wanting to make more instead of having it go to artist pay. Similarly, that's why you likely saw them cut big name artists from parties and such, because it makes it much harder to be profitable.