“Something major” coming to DHS???

Rutt

Well-Known Member
Yes she is a concert draw....but again, I don't see people actually planning trips to WDW specifically to see a re-skin of Rock and RollerCoaster (which already has crazy long waits) with a snippet of Taylor Swift music... It would have to be something new and completely unique.....
Me thinks you severely underestimate Swifties.

Having paid 1k plus per ticket to take my daughter to the concert, then 40 bucks each to watch the concert in theaters, to 40 bucks for a local swiftie concert with a swift impersonator with 7 of my daughters friends...

She would absolutely have us book a trip for the day this ride opened, whatever the cost. And she wouldn't be alone.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Me thinks you severely underestimate Swifties.

Having paid 1k plus per ticket to take my daughter to the concert, then 40 bucks each to watch the concert in theaters, to 40 bucks for a local swiftie concert with a swift impersonator with 7 of my daughters friends...

She would absolutely have us book a trip for the day this ride opened, whatever the cost. And she wouldn't be alone.
Her latest album makes it plain as day that she is pushing for Rock ‘n’ Roller Coaster Starring Charlie Puth.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Having paid 1k plus per ticket to take my daughter to the concert, then 40 bucks each to watch the concert in theaters, to 40 bucks for a local swiftie concert with a swift impersonator with 7 of my daughters friends...

She would absolutely have us book a trip for the day this ride opened, whatever the cost. And she wouldn't be alone.
…i can write you prescription to help with those symptoms 👨🏻‍⚕️
 

DisneyRoy

Well-Known Member
…i can write you prescription to help with those symptoms 👨🏻‍⚕️
Saturday Night Live Snl GIF by PeacockTV
 

PizzaPlanet

Well-Known Member
I keep thinking how perfect the Streets of America would’ve been for something Marvel related. Since they couldn’t have used the Avengers, maybe Daredevil or Dr. Strange?
 

GravityFalls

Active Member
I know everyone will hate this, but hear me out.

When the Fox deal happened there was pressure from management to use some of those properties in the parks. But we haven't seen any integration beyond a NatGeo photo op at Animal Kingdom and a teased Avatar expansion to Disneyland/DCA.

If that pressure still exists, the best location for a Fox based land or attraction (other than Avatar) is probably DHS. Universal's deal for the Simpson's rights is coming to an end in 2028. The show is one of the most viewed properties on Disney+. There are a ton of opportunities for merchandise and food/beverage sales. The aesthetic of the show is cheap to replicate on a theme park scale.

There are so many lands and attractions I'd rather see at DHS, but I wouldn't at all be surprised if this expansion ends up being a Simpsons land. It's a decision I could see happen if imagineering continues to be driven by metrics and numbers from the c-suite.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
Disney has more IP than they could ever have enough property to turn into attractions if they wanted.... Why would they disregard the vast catalog they already currently own that is associated with the Disney brand and start using IP that is not considered part of the Disney brand?
Simpsons worked in Universal... they did it already.... there is no need to have a Disney version....
 

GravityFalls

Active Member
Disney has more IP than they could ever have enough property to turn into attractions if they wanted.... Why would they disregard the vast catalog they already currently own that is associated with the Disney brand and start using IP that is not considered part of the Disney brand?
Simpsons worked in Universal... they did it already.... there is no need to have a Disney version....
I agree completely

It would be an illogical decision from a creative and brand management perspective.

The question is whether the c-suite is still under pressure to justify their decision to purchase Fox and whether that pressure will manifest in putting Fox properties into the Disney Parks (the most profitable part of the company). If that's the case then it's unavoidable, some Fox property will end up in one of these parks.

Hopefully that pressure no longer exists, there is no Rio proposal for the Tropical Americas Animal Kingdom expansion, something that would make more thematic sense (again I don't want this).

I don't want Simpsons to happen, I just wouldn't be surprised if it happens.
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
I thought they moved Feature Animation back to California since it was shown that producing films from Florida was too costly?...hence why they closed the Walt Disney Animation attraction to begin with...?
but there is still a division there and fully staffed?
After the dreaded Treasure Planet box office dud, Eisner gutted the Animation dept and a number of them got laid off.
 

Andrew25

Well-Known Member
The Simpsons does marvelous merch/F&B wise at UOR... you don't think Disney is jealous? lol

I'm not expecting an attraction whatsoever at WDW... but a retheme of something like Backlot Express into a F&B area is doable...

Heck, a retheme of Pixar Place into Springfield can do well there with a few M&G's, Lard Lad Donuts kiosk, and a Duff Brewery.
 

pdude81

Well-Known Member
The Simpsons does marvelous merch/F&B wise at UOR... you don't think Disney is jealous? lol

I'm not expecting an attraction whatsoever at WDW... but a retheme of something like Backlot Express into a F&B area is doable...

Heck, a retheme of Pixar Place into Springfield can do well there with a few M&G's, Lard Lad Donuts kiosk, and a Duff Brewery.
I could definitely see a presence at Disney Springs if Universal let's go of the IP when their contract runs out.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom