Search results

you say that but I'd take a Splash Mt quality attraction like that over most of the attractions at Epic

Cheaper because you can't leave an Apple Store for under $200.

And this was only built because the shells were built with Pop.

They look great as far as a value resort goes. The outdoor pool bar areas specifically.

I keep hearing this about the lack of "busting." How many did they actually show being busted in the original? Slimer, Runner in the park, 2 Terror Dogs, Gozer, and Stay-Puft? They had the short scene with their rise (which included the runner in the park) but didn't really show them busting...

It was ok. I think I'd be ok if the next movie didn't have any of the originals in it. Let the new cast do their thing. (Unless Rick Moranis wants to come back!)

I'm wondering this as well.

Loosely based on one.

The rollercoaster doesn't look like it goes high at all. Seems to be a really low terrain coaster. Also, that Toothless meet and greet is hopefully like the Raptor encounter. Not to mention the walkaround dragons and the possibility of the flying dragon drones...should be incredible.

We did know pretty much all of it but what I got out of this video is how beautiful the land is. We knew the attractions...but seeing the little touches and everything in color really brought it all together. This looks stunning.

My initial thought was SNW due to the fact we know so much about it...but then March 10 came and went and it has me wondering if they were ready to announce SNW, why not do it on MAR10? So I then got thinking that maybe it's either Dark Universe of HtTyD. I don't think it'll be Potter because...

I'm glad there isn't an attraction where you fly over beautiful landscapes shoved in front of a giant screen. Or even better...I'm so glad there aren't multiple instances where you fly a spaceship (and have an engineer...and a pilot). There is only so much that can be done with the "Test...

So, removing all theming similarities, couldn't you say that about multiple attractions? I don't understand how a virtual "lightcycle" run where you're trying to destroy the other users is the same as two race cars lining up on a track to race. But that's just me. I'd say the current version...

The Tron aesthetic is going away... why do people think that's staying? Rather than Test Track 1.0 where it was an actual testing facility...and Test Track 2.0 which was a digital testing ground... I'd love Test Track 3.0 to be as if you're in an actual test mule. You drive through different...

I think I already mentioned this earlier in the thread but enclosing the outdoor portion with a wrap-around screen could REALLY enhance this attraction. The old "crash test" car could be another car you race. You stop at the line, the green light goes and you take off...the "crash test car"...

I do like the idea of the track not being lit. It'll make it look themed at night which is my biggest issue with this coaster. Makes me wonder why they wouldn't paint the tracks black and navy/purple to hide them more.

I know I'm probably in the minority but I think Gringott's is so lackluster. The ride pacing is so disjointed. It's a coaster section to move you in front of a screen...and then onto another screen. What payoff? It just ends. No real climax at all. The queue is amazing...but "amazing"...

Completely agree. Hagrid's (IMO) is a much better attraction than Velocicoaster but when comparing Velocicoaster to TRON (closest competitor), it's not even a competition. Post launch, Tron is boring and a really lackluster coaster.

That better be some show scene because even for a kiddie coaster this looks extremely dull.

So was Stitch's Great Escape....