It was written by someone who clearly doesn't understand the industry. The "Fantasy Springs isn't realistic" and "The book report rides contradict the 'active' rides of the rest of the park" were just plain stupid arguments.
The name used to be Disney's California Adventure but was changed during 2009-2014 revamp to Disney California Adventure. They did this to denote not that it was theme park about California, but rather an adventure that took place in Disney's only Californian resort destination.
Then explain to me Frozen Journey, Raphael's Lantern Festival, even Peter Pan's Neverland Adventure. I highly doubt Universal will match their quality when Epic Universe opens.
While there are indeed less a few Universal dark rides that surpass Tiana's Bayou Adventure in quality, the notion that "Disney can't make dark rides anymore" is simply absurd. Disney remains the undisputed king in this realm. Their extensive list of dark rides from the past 15 years far...
They cant build rides? That's absurd. Tiana's Bayou Adventure, although having a plethora of flaws, is higher quality then any dark Universal has ever produced.
WDI seems to be doing alright-- look at Fantasy Springs: it's evident that the American parks aren't given the budget necessary to match those kinds of experiences.
It's a step up from Splash Mountain overall, but the way they've integrated the music is just terrible. Why do the characters talk over their own music tracks? It's such an odd choice. They should have minimized the screens, included Naveen in areas where there's nothing but fireflies and...