Disney is doing it better by doing the virtual line. Universal dropped the ball on saying they were gonna do it and then not. Yeah you might not ride, but you can at least go ride other things while waiting.
DHS has two shows right when you walk in too with Indy and Frozen. Little Mermaid is right there also really. I think you’re making up this weird stipulation for show locations.
Why does Disney like doing attractions on dead franchises? Ratatouille was 12 years ago and no one cares about Tron. It’s a stunt show so using their own action franchise as the IP makes perfect sense. Terminator isn’t their IP and the license was up. Time to move on especially the trash that’s...
Hogsmeade may be cramped, but saying it has very little to do is confusing. It has three rides, restaurant, bar, multiple shops, small stage show, interactive wand show, and interactive wand locations. Things to do isn’t near an issue for Hogsmeade.
There is 0 chance that building is Pokemon related. They aren’t wasting Pokémon on a single attraction in a hub. It will likely be the first expansion or take over a land in IOA or USF.
Both parks have done great things lately. I started this due to someone saying Diagon wasn’t game changing which was hilarious. If Universal announces the new Park tomorrow we all win. If it’s all Worlds designed like the SNW we all win. I love both parks and am finally going to a Disneysea in...
The Diagon dragon is perfect. Expecting or wanting that to move makes no sense being outside 24/7 in Florida.
Also get out of here with the not game changing Potter lands. Saying Potter lands aren’t game changing is the worst take you will find on this site to date.
Only other gaming ideas worth much are Pokemon and Zelda outside of what’s already planned. No other franchise outside of maybe Minecraft is worth the time and money to implement.