Search results

So to clarify in metaphorical format - They have cleaned up the bedroom, removed all the junk, and made it clean. But they haven't put a bed in, no desk, no tv, and no lights. But they have put a small plant pot in the far side of the room. Would that be about correct ?

So to clarify what you mean to say is they have cleared lands, tidied everything up - and all they are missing is the 'actual attractions'. I don't know but i would have thought after so many years the main issue should have been putting in attractions rather than tidying up.

That's the sum of all the expansion ? Blimey ... disappointing is not a strong enough word. And we wasted 174 pages on all of this.

So for fear of reading through the 174 pages .... what is it we are actually getting? I sense the tone is a tad disappointing from some posters.

Genuine question - but does anyone rank the decision to virtually render a vast swathe of Epcot under construction walls for so many years, as one of the worst decisions of all time in the history of Disney?

Well at least it's not a coaster i suppose.

Hopefully the new attraction - whilst not sounding particularly groundbreaking - will not be a screen attraction, and thus reduce the eye strain fatigue in that area of Studios.

Yeah but the name (IP) ...

Surely it could go into Studios. But not sure the franchise is doing that well to warrant going forward - seen as the second only made half the first (although it still made big numbers). It actually fits a much needed landscape for the studios - as it doesn't rely on screen and isn't a coaster.

Yeah come on now though .... will we have more than just trees though ? Is there any sort of attraction ?

To save myself 248 pages of reading ... can have a recreation of what the final product will be ? I know there will be trees. Trees and more trees. We all love trees after all.

Have they finished this yet ? These trees must be something special.

I despite those who don't want attractions to be moth balled under the guise of 'nostalga'. Annual passes for locals should be banned.

My observations - 1) Star Wars Galaxy Edge has not been a game changer for Disney Hollywood Studios in regards attendance. I'd have expected double digit growth for Studios. In my opinion it's such an underwhelming experience - and of course it's very debatable whether using the new movies...

Nonsense of the highest order. The Harry Potter lands and attractions were game changers for Universal - look at the massive jump in attendances once they were built.

The attraction itself is still very good. The exterior, the IP, pre ride queue etc is just horrific.

So 36% of the new attractions on opening day will be a roller coaster. That's a percentage too far in my opinion.

For the fear of reading through many pages - what dark attractions will there be? Furthermore, any updates on what percentage of attractions will be roller coasters? Because if they are taking the path down coasters i will be concerned.

They were building alot of attractions. The two Harry Potter worlds were incredible. Since then though they have ventured towards too many screen attractions to now over indulging in too many roller coasters. Have to say though 'Hagrids' is incredible.

Okay so out of the glut of new attractions can anyone tell me what percentage are roller coasters ? For me, i don't mind the odd roller coaster, but too many then goes down the territory of Six Flags.