Search results

that could be said of any theme, with enough money.

Have you shown her "A Christmas Carol"? Now Doctor Who would be an incredible acquisition for Disney if you wanna talk about endless possibilities. That's what that show is about.

That's what people don't understand, conservation is not a theme and this is a theme park.

Once again message is not theme, they're different. Plus you're counting it against me that I love the park? Whys is that a negative thing? If I hated animal Kingdom then I wouldn't care about anything that happens to it. You talk of hardcore Disney fans being fine with it and yet you cite my...

Conservation is such an abstract idea that you can't just have theme park rides about alien planets and say "oh this is so all about conservation and nature" when what you see is just some dressed up ride. Just because the movie and theme park somehow share the same message doesn't mean they...

it wasn't just imaginary, Beastly Kingdom represented animals that were still an important part of our collective history and culture. It's not the same as imaginary animals in some movie.

Yeah, all parts of the WORLD, not some far off distant imaginary planet set in the far future.

Yep, a tree carved with ANIMALS all over it. yeah cause dinosaurs are imaginary ANIMALS right? Yeah that's ONE RIDE in Asia, that's devoted to the ANIMALS of Asia. because you know, the last thing we think about when we think of Africa is ANIMALS right?

But that's not the point of Animal Kingdom, it's a tribute to the beauty and wonders of the animal kingdom on earth. If I wanted to be transported to some far off planet that also has these incredible things I would go to EPCOT or DHS where the theme fits better if not perfectly.

Fail how? none of my arguments have even been countered properly. If you read the dedication it was all about the animals, not the planet, for that you go to EPCOT. where in the entire dedication to DAK does it say all of the planet? and even if it did, it would only further detract from...

how do you even know that it's going to be a massive, dense rainforest? Did you actually watch the movie? It started on a spaceship that went to another planet. If anything the land would look incredible if it were made indoors.

I actually think Avatar is very Disney-like. It's a nice enough family friendly adventure, I just think it would fit in better in EPCOT, or even Tomorrowland, just because of the very distinct Science Fiction framing to the movie.

yeah it's gonna be amazing, but put it somewhere else.

I don't even care if it's the greatest attraction ever to be attracted, you're missing the point that it would be like putting all of Marvel Superhero Island into Animal Kingdom. Yeah i love the Spiderman ride but do i think it fits in with DAK? no.

Those imagined animals were just flashy plot devices, that wasn't the point of the movie. The point of the movie were the people and the trees. And the kingdom of beauty and wonder were referring to the ANIMALS of the Animal kingdom, not the land.

yeah but it's still going to be an entire land, what ever the attractions may be the land itself is going to be a huge part of Animal Kingdom's identity. Just imagine all of Africa being put in Disney's Hollywood Studios, or Adventureland being put in EPCOT.

that's a lot of information though, we know it's gonna be a Whole Land. and we know what kind of movie Avatar is and what it's about. I saw it twice in theaters. I know exactly how the movie is in relation to what Animal Kingdom is about.

Well I'm very passionate about Animal Kingdom, it's my favorite park in all of WDW, precisely because it's so far managed to keep its over-all theme largely intact. This current development will signal the end to that.

exactly, we're discussing themes. The Avatar theme does not fit in with Animal Kingdom, sure the message does but the theme doesn't.

so does "The Hunger Games"