Search results

Accountants don’t make decisions like that. If you want to say “Finance” people I’ll let it slide.

So you are saying if Little Mermaid opened in 1971 and was being replaced today with Mr Toad’s you’d say “Excellent move, this new ride is 10x better!!” ?

Silver Dollar City is nice, I go every year. Silver Dollar City should not be compared to Disney under any wild scenario of any form. If that’s what Disney would be without IP then give me IP on every bench or sidewalk or curb. The point is an attraction is not good or bad because it does...

Or they could put in the expansion pad under the berm between Galaxy’s Edge and Toy Story Mania show building. It would add something to the land to have some activity in that dead area (but they’d need to explain away the timeline of old characters somehow)

I did cherry pick, that’s fair, but it’s hardly a small sample it’s 24 years (not 14). To say they have continually added more just wasn’t the case for a 1/4 century until they dropped Galaxy’s Edge in and then later Mickey and Minnie’s. The rest of @TrainsOfDisney ‘s comments were a valid...

But why spend all that money to move something and end up with nothing added? I’d get it if we all said they had plenty of capacity, otherwise I don’t think $ should be spent to love something unless it’s a no brained… IE Lion King theater for Pandora.

Is that factual or revisionist memory? Between 1995 and 2019 Disneyland’s most significant new attraction was… Buzz Lightyear or Pooh?

Plus I believe the road you mention behind Village Haus is below grade, as it serves the utilidor entrance well below ground level in Fantasyland.

What’s going to be the topper? The HP ride? I can’t tell much on it yet from what little I know.

Just because they didn’t announce to the public doesn’t mean they don’t know where it’s going.

Disney Adult here, term doesn’t bother me in the least. First trip I was 35, kids now grown and wife and I have AP without them and we live halfway across the country.

3rd time isn’t a charm 😉

Ironically I do work for a Fortune 200 company. I’ll repeat, you don’t modify your 3+ yr plans based on short term economic factors or you’d be blowing in the wind and cancel or double down 5 times before you get right back where you were. Nothing short of a pandemic or 9/11 should impact what...

You don’t manage long term projects based on which way the wind blows today.

Not really any funnier than when you posted it on Sunday. Certainly not funny enough for an encore posting.

Makes sense and I don’t disagree in general. If given the opportunity to do that in forward planning I’d be for it, but I wouldn’t spend extra $$$ to move things when those funds could be better utilized (my opinion) in added capacity.

I really don't get the thought process of Pixar needing to be together (and this isn't just you, I see it frequently). Why do I care who the film studio is when walking around a theme park? Do I need Coco to be next to Toy Story to make sense to me from a theming perspective? - not in any sort...

Operational dependability - that's all. It could be something they haven't done before, but it better be something that has been tested and tested and tested before you commit to using that tech.

I agree, go all in regardless of how successful another park may or may not be. But I will say I’d like them to go all in on proven dependable technology.

This is a thread about Villains land, can we move the Uni Epic vs Disney chat elsewhere? If you want to take my opinion to that new location, MK will be #1 FL park attendance in 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030… and it’s not even a remote question.