FigmentFan82
Well-Known Member
Btw, it is not at all uncommon for a new CEO to carve their own path and do things their way pretty quickly.
I was gonna say "To be fair, didn't Iger basically cause the downfall of Disney Animation after 2016 too?", but then I realized that if I did, somebody would bring up Encanto.His stubbornness is astronomical and it nearly caused the downfall of Disney Animation forever.
And despite all of their replacing, there's still a lot of wasted space. The empty Stitch space, Princess Fairytale Hall and the Tomorrowland Speedway, to name a few.Failing to expand MK in a meaningful way.
Maybe they still visit because there's still things about the parks they like? Y'know, attractions that Iger hasn't taken an axe to or wasn't involved in creating?I find it strange that so many who complain that the parks are poorly managed also continue to visit the parks regularly.
I doubt too many people are going if they don’t like anything at all about the parks.Maybe they still visit because there's still things about the parks they like?
My biggest gripe is they constantly leave space and building unused or underused. What is the excuse for having Stitch completely unused? Ridiculous. I hate this management team.I was gonna say "To be fair, didn't Iger basically cause the downfall of Disney Animation after 2016 too?", but then I realized that if I did, somebody would bring up Encanto.
I liked Strange World and Zootopia 2 as well, but the first one was a flop and the second was another sequel.
And despite all of their replacing, there's still a lot of wasted space. The empty Stitch space, Princess Fairytale Hall and the Tomorrowland Speedway, to name a few.
Maybe they still visit because there's still things about the parks they like? Y'know, attractions that Iger hasn't taken an axe to or wasn't involved in creating?
Some of us have genuine love for the Parks because it was a big part of our childhoods. They also have not yet ruined it all because it will take decades to completely ruin it and we hold out hope they'll regain a vision that makes sense.I find it strange that so many who complain that the parks are poorly managed also continue to visit the parks regularly.
Sounds like you found the perfect amount of Disney that works best for you!Some of us have genuine love for the Parks because it was a big part of our childhoods. They also have not yet ruined it all because it will take decades to completely ruin it and we hold out hope they'll regain a vision that makes sense.
I have however backed down my visits and spend while I'm there. During the Covid year where there was nowhere else to go, I went like 50 days and actually enjoyed the lower crowds. Since then, I'm only going 12-14 days/year with much more irregular annual pass purchases. I travel around 65 days/year and Disney is only about 20% of that now.
If I want to feel more like Disney, I'd honestly rather go to Tokyo Disney. At least they have Splash.
But it doesn't stop the complaining and desire for a better Disney experience. We should have gotten a better successor than an establishment guy.Sounds like you found the perfect amount of Disney that works best for you!
But that didn’t happen.But it doesn't stop the complaining and desire for a better Disney experience. We should have gotten a better successor than an establishment guy.
What didn't happen? You can disagree, but Disney went with the establishment guy.But that didn’t happen.
You said they should have gotten someone you would consider a better guy and I said that didn’t happen. They went with an establishment guy because I think Disney is okay with the direction they’re heading in.What didn't happen? You can disagree, but Disney went with the establishment guy.
That's why they're incompetent. Who would be OK with the direction of charging infinity at the parks and owning a negative return stock.You said they should have gotten someone you would consider a better guy and I said that didn’t happen. They went with an establishment guy because I think Disney is okay with the direction they’re heading in.
Looks like there will be another 10 to 20 years of the same thing since they went with an establishment guy.That's why they're incompetent. Who would be OK with the direction of charging infinity at the parks and owning a negative return stock.
The reason why? Its been said many times. Those in charge don't understand the parks. They think they are for Carnies and view them as the ATMThat's why they're incompetent. Who would be OK with the direction of charging infinity at the parks and owning a negative return stock.
I've said it before, but it's probably just because they don't have any popular science fiction IPs that aren't already being used in the parks.What is the excuse for having Stitch completely unused? Ridiculous. I hate this management team.
My guess would be the people making all the money from those infinite prices and that are also aware that once the stock hits a certain level they can just sell the company and get a big payout from it.Who would be OK with the direction of charging infinity at the parks and owning a negative return stock.
Do you folks actual read what you write before you hit post?
Imo Stitch, Incredibles, and Big Hero 6 would all fit in Tomorrowland. (And arguably Wreck It Ralph)I've said it before, but it's probably just because they don't have any popular science fiction IPs that aren't already being used in the parks.
Then again, when have an IP actually fitting in the land it's put in or it already being used in the parks ever stopped them before?
Stitch was already there and again, should’ve never left, but a completely new Stitch ride would be awesome…Imo Stitch, Incredibles, and Big Hero 6 would all fit in Tomorrowland. (And arguably Wreck It Ralph)
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.