• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

DAK 'Encanto' and 'Indiana Jones'-themed experiences at Animal Kingdom

WaltWiz1901

Well-Known Member
See, a ride can be both expensive and cheap.
all made possible by the multiple, often redundant layers of WDI's bureaucracy taking budgets well beyond more than they should be relative to the scope of the project at hand and the newer generation of Imagineers essentially being allowed to phone it in as long as whatever IP's hot at the moment is attached to it because the aura of "Hey look, I'm an Imagineer!" has a greater impact than what they're creating. remember that under the Bobs' Disney, even a simple land (overlay) could cost up to $200 million
I think they should do a Tokyo Winnie the Pooh type ride for Jungle Book but maybe a little simpler. Keep it a simple typically Disney dark ride just done very well with more modern effects. Not crazy expensive and not a huge people attractor but good on capacity.
agreed...in general, more higher-level IP-based dark rides should aim to be more like Hunny Hunt: leveraging the combination of animatronics, effects, technology, and set design just well enough to elevate (or "plus") what can easily be communicated as a simple, satisfying C-ticket ride into something truly special (not to mention truly ✨immersive✨).

I'd argue money isn't even the main obstacle in that regard; rather, it's the higher-ups' lack of investment towards anything that doesn't make them instant bank and the jaded, lopsided mindset that "modern = SCREENZ"
 

Gremlin Gus

Well-Known Member


HBMPtqDXgAAkDL0


HBMSxNYboAAR4Mf


HBMVTbxXEAAyLMT


HBMXyo5a4AAHvyg


HBMcoNdboAAgHGe


HBMfhSGXYAAyuo9


HBMiCCxXkAARNTW


HBMkfsFa4AE3ZJp


HBMkfsOaYAAfhvB


HBMmHKyWIAAuaw1


HBMnAAxWkAAFpq_
 
Last edited:

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Interesting that the one missing beam at the front of the building is likely the one they're signing as the "final" one for Encanto even though the queue portion of the building is still missing.
 

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
Is it too late to petition Disney to reconsider making the carousel about Disney characters? This one change would do considerable improvement toward this not feeling like a Disney IP land and more aligned with Africa and Asia.
Nah I think it makes sense within the story they set. It's someone who enjoys Disney movies, to me its not much different than the actors in Harambe telling the story of the Lion King, etc.
 

dmc493

Well-Known Member
Is it too late to petition Disney to reconsider making the carousel about Disney characters? This one change would do considerable improvement toward this not feeling like a Disney IP land and more aligned with Africa and Asia.
I'll reserve my judgment until I know the % of non-IP vs IP horses on the carousel. If it's 50/50 or better (towards non-IP) then I have very little issue with it
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
Nah I think it makes sense within the story they set. It's someone who enjoys Disney movies, to me its not much different than the actors in Harambe telling the story of the Lion King, etc.

They could just not do that story then. Festival of the Lion King is a stretch, but the rest of Africa is not about IP at all. If this carousel is all Disney IP, then the land is entirely IP, making "Tropical Americas" in-line with Africa and Asia by name only.

Also, one thing worth noting is that Festival of the Lion King is a show primarily about the human performers, with the Lion King animal characters acting as show hosts. The show has a lot of theatrical performance art value beyond the attached IP. It's not a show about the movie The Lion King, it's a performance art hosted by The Lion King. A pretty big key difference in making an IP fit with the park organically and having something new and interesting to show you vs. superficially and lazily.
 
Last edited:

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
If this carousel is all Disney IP, then the land is entirely IP, making "Tropical Americas" in-line with Africa and Asia by name only.
It is not comparable in name only. It's structurally comparable as well, which counts for a lot in the current environment. If the land itself is IP-agnostic, it can persist while pieces of it change out over time, perhaps even to non-IP attractions, assuming they ever try again. That's not the case with how most single-IP lands are structured. If Avatar ever falls out of favor, Pandora has to be largely scrapped and redone from scratch. Same with Monstropolis, Batuu, Andy's back yard, etc. They make no sense absent the IP, unlike Tropical Americas.
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
It is not comparable in name only. It's structurally comparable as well, which counts for a lot in the current environment. If the land itself is IP-agnostic, it can persist while pieces of it change out over time, perhaps even to non-IP attractions, assuming they ever try again. That's not the case with how most single-IP lands are structured. If Avatar ever falls out of favor, Pandora has to be largely scrapped and redone from scratch. Same with Monstropolis, Batuu, Andy's back yard, etc. They make no sense absent the IP, unlike Tropical Americas.

That is true, and hopefully Rohde and whoever can make the land itself appear as culturally rich as Africa and Asia do. But this is why I feel that one ride that has no attached IP would go a long way. Make the carousel an extension of the theming of the land, not a tie-in. I mean, it's just a carousel, will people really be upset if they're not specifically riding on Baloo or whatever?? Will the fact that it IS Baloo actually increase ridership?? I doubt it. It's a carousel.

It serves its purpose better as a thematic centerpiece than an IP tie in attraction.
 
Last edited:

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
They could just not do that story then. Festival of the Lion King is a stretch, but the rest of Africa is not about IP at all. If this carousel is all Disney IP, then the land is entirely IP, making "Tropical Americas" in-line with Africa and Asia by name only.

Also, one thing worth noting is that Festival of the Lion King is a show primarily about the human performers, with the Lion King animal characters acting as show hosts. The show has a lot of theatrical performance art value beyond the attached IP. It's not a show about the movie The Lion King, it's a performance art hosted by The Lion King. A pretty big key difference in making an IP fit with the park organically and having something new and interesting to show you vs. superficially and lazily.
The land is not entirely IP as a land is not only about attractions, its about the food (which is a non IP location, shopping and overall experience. (we are getting a new playground that afaik is not IP which means its technically the latest non IP attraction (unless it is themed to IJ which it might be))
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
That is true, and hopefully Rohde and whoever can make the land itself appear as culturally rich as Africa and Asia do. But this is why I feel that one ride that has no attached IP would go a long way. Make the carousel an extension of the theming of the land, not a tie-in. I mean, it's just a carousel, will people really be upset if they're not specifically riding on Baloo or whatever?? Will the fact that it IS Baloo actually increase ridership?? I doubt it. It's a carousel.
I agree generally, I just think that if you're in a place where you legitimately can switch out the carousel figures for anything and/or make the ride at the back a generic romp through a cryptid temple instead of involving IJ and not have to touch anything else about the land, you're in a much better position than you are with the IP facsimile lands.
 

AidenRodriguez731

Well-Known Member
I agree generally, I just think that if you're in a place where you legitimately can switch out the carousel figures for anything and/or make the ride at the back a generic romp through a cryptid temple instead of involving IJ and not have to touch anything else about the land, you're in a much better position than you are with the IP facsimile lands.
Agreed on that, the only ride in this land that would be hard with is Encanto but tbh, I see it staying around for the long haul as a property, especially with nostalgia.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom