danlb_2000
Premium Member
Expansion of existing parks. No one is saying a fifth gate. These are two different kinds of expansion, an apples and oranges comparison
You are correct, my train of thought went off the tracks.
Expansion of existing parks. No one is saying a fifth gate. These are two different kinds of expansion, an apples and oranges comparison
My position is a bit different I did like dinosaur but I don’t think it’s a cardinal sin to close it; but I also think it wouldn’t have been a bad decision to keep Dinoland, and expand even further. AK is really hurting. I think Disney even tacitly acknowledges this with how often the AK single day tickets are lower than the other 3 parks. It simply isn’t even close to a full day park. Will tropical America make it one? If you stretch your day and really relax I think it’s possible (and also be prepared for long lines). Especially with the earlier closure. but if Disney can add one more significant E ticket and a couple more C/D AK would become a real gemTropical Americas is still partly an expansion. It's expanding further back from where primeval whirl was. It's also expanding capacity with a large indoor dark ride (Encanto) replacing a rollercoaster that hasn't operated in 6 years and some pay to.play carnival games. Is it a shame that Dinosaur is closed? Absolutely. But it doesn't mean this whole land is just an overplayed replacement
Disney has been destroying so much it’s hard to keep up with Martin’s tributesAlready done 3 of them![]()
You’re good.You are correct, my train of thought went off the tracks.![]()
It's clear that all the WDW parks should expand.
Until they touch one another.
Then make it just one gate.
It's clear that all the WDW parks should expand.
Until they touch one another.
Then make it just one gate.
D.H.M.A.K.C.O.T for short.Disney's Hollywood Magic Animal Kingdom Community of Tomorrow
Don't worry, since they never actually expand, there is no fear that will ever happen.It's clear that all the WDW parks should expand.
Until they touch one another.
Then make it just one gate.
At this point why build anything since everything they put out is going to be IP based whether it fits where it is placed or not?Y'know, it's probably for the best that Beastly Kingdom wasn't built. If it had been, Iger probably would've shoehorned a Frozen ride or something into it by now.
Wasn't Beastly Kingdom going to have a Fantasia boat ride, and would have opened just before Fantasia 2000 released?Y'know, it's probably for the best that Beastly Kingdom wasn't built. If it had been, Iger probably would've shoehorned a Frozen ride or something into it by now.
I like how at Disneyland the waits are actually reasonable compared to Orlando because there’s just so many rides.Agree!
I used to criticize WDW for its inefficient use of space compared to Disneyland, for example, but this week when I visited DLR for the second time ever, it made me appreciate how the Florida parks are designed.
At Disneyland Park, even the low crowd days feel incredibly crowded, because the pathways are so tight and there’s not as much acreage to spread people out. DCA faces this problem to a lesser extent, but it’s still worse than any of the FL parks.
Could rides be more efficiently laid out at WDW? Sure. And, I’ll admit, there’s certainly more replacement going on than is necessary.
But, having attractions spaced out, large pathways, and giant weenies helps to add to the sense of scale, awe, and wonder, and it’s actually something WDW does quite well.
I had such conflicting opinions back when I had my Magic Key, because I hated being in the park with how chaotic and congested it always felt, yet had good success with wait timesI like how at Disneyland the waits are actually reasonable compared to Orlando because there’s just so many rides.
Theme parks fans aren’t trying to make rational business decisions…... and this is why I bring it up, since others are saying the exapnsion is the path to higher profits.
Not really, no. It's gonna have the same number of attractions (they're replacing three attractions with... three attractions), and if you're like me and don't care about Indiana Jones and Encanto, you're likely not going to want to see the new rides, so that takes even less time off your visit to the park.It simply isn’t even close to a full day park. Will tropical America make it one?
Fair point. But wasn't the Fantasia boat ride going to focus primarily on the "Pastoral Symphony" and "Dance of the Hours" segments? Y'know, the ones about mythological creatures and animals respectively? I don't even know if there were going to be any scenes from Fantasia 2000 in it.Wasn't Beastly Kingdom going to have a Fantasia boat ride, and would have opened just before Fantasia 2000 released?
I'm pretty sure he said that he wanted to do a Tropical Americas land for DAK with some of his proposals including demolishing Dinoland USA for it. But as I said in an earlier post, I'm guessing Disney never greenlit it due to the IP mandate and not really having that many Central and/or South American IP's to put it in there until Encanto released and was a huge hit to put it in the parks.I just saw a post on Instagram claiming that Joe Rhode has been trying to get a Tropical America land greenlit for Animal Kingdom, with many of his pitches replacing Dinoland, for years.
Call me skeptical, but I doubt that Joe - the guy behind Animal Kingdom and who probably understands it better than anyone - ever said, "You know what we should do? We should remove dinosaurs from the park and shoehorn in two IPs that don't fit in the park!"
MAYBE he wanted to do a South America land that actually focused on animals, but I doubt the Indiana Jones retheme of Dinosaur and an Encanto ride were his idea.
No offense, but that's kinda on you if you don't make DAK a full day park by not doing certain attractions. Sure there's some you can skip like Better Zoogether unless you really need something to do, but DAK can be a full day park if you're okay riding attractions more than once and you just take your time with the land and not rush it.Not really, no. It's gonna have the same number of attractions (they're replacing three attractions with... three attractions), and if you're like me and don't care about Indiana Jones and Encanto, you're likely not going to want to see the new rides, so that takes even less time off your visit to the park.
My point was that whenever I point out that Indiana Jones and Encanto don't fit in Animal Kingdom, folks on here insist that they're going to make the attractions focus on animals, but when we point out that Moana doesn't fit suddenly it becomes "oh, Animal Kingdom isn't about animals, it's about nature and humans' connection to it." So by that logic, the Encanto and Indiana Jones rides won't fit even if they ARE about animals.
Call me skeptical, but I doubt that Joe
Joe was more willing to play ball with the Iger regime and put his name on questionable projects in the later days of his career, sadly.You quoted two short sentences and seem to have absorbed neither of them.
The Animal Kingdom is part of nature. So whether the attraction focuses on animals’ nature, or conservation efforts, they are two sides of the same coin that are Joe’s defined themes. Both have been or could be easily massaged to be about “nature”; whether animal or environmental nature.
The nice thing about Moana is that it’s a mostly unused property that could in theory find its way into all four gates without completely missing their themes if the attraction focuses correctly.
You cannot complain that people don’t understand, if your position is simply you won’t believe anything. Whether by obstinance or incomprehension, you ignore the things we have been told. Such as the story treatment for an Encanto attraction.
Joe’s proposals even included an Indy conversion of Dinosaur in various treatments. We have a several hundred page thread about it from 2017; it was the follow up project he was pitching after Pandora. His post then goes on to endorse what they are doing.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.