I don't know where you're coming up with that number, as you're the only one I've seen on the internet say that specific number. That would indicate that WBD is valuing the linear assets at close to $7/share, not happening. As again Wall St has indicated that the linear assets would likely fetch $2-3/share in the open market making it a max of $31-32/share combined. But even if that is what WBD wants because they value the linear assets as higher, then request either to raise their bids and let whomever has the higher offer win out. Also I don't think the Ellison's will have any issue securing additional financing if they need it, they already have indicated they can go above $30/share if needed. And I expect them to increase it, as the current $30/share is likely just the beginning. Its classic Ellison negotiating, you start low and come up as needed. If you'd followed the families history in business you'd know that. So no they didn't have an issue putting together $30/share, don't believe whatever Reddit you got that from. This is one of the richest families on the planet. They just weren't going to go right out give the highest offer they could the first time. $30/share wasn't even their best and final offer either.
Also again this isn't about "sob stories". Its about what is best for the shareholders and the industry. If the BoD really feels that the Netflix deal is the best then let the shareholders decide between the two and whomever they vote for wins. But to not give the shareholders a choice, especially when one is potentially higher than the other, is just wrong.