• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

HKDL gets new castle, frozen land and marvel land.

Haymarket

Well-Known Member
Ocean Park may offload Water World to government after HK$274m loss

23-10-2025 17:20 HKT

by Winona Cheung

Ocean Park is considering offloading its loss-making Water World to the government — or even shutting it down — after the attraction dragged the theme park into a deeper deficit of more than HK$274 million last year, raising fears that taxpayers may soon have to pick up the tab.

Chairman Paulo Pong Kin-yee admitted on Thursday that the water park had become a major financial burden, while the main Ocean Park site has returned to profit.

Speaking on a radio program this morning, he said all options were on the table, including handing over the attraction’s operation to the Leisure and Cultural Services Department.

“I cannot completely deny this option (to fully close the water park), but we really need to discuss it with different stakeholders,” Pong said. “No options are off the table.”

The remarks have sparked renewed questions about whether the government, which has already injected billions into Ocean Park in previous bailouts, could again be drawn in to shoulder further losses.

According to documents submitted to the Legislative Council on Wednesday, the park’s total revenue for the 2024/25 fiscal year — which ended on June 30 — climbed nine percent to HK$1.28 billion. However, it still posted a widened deficit of HK$274.7 million, up from HK$71.6 million the previous year.

The shortfall was mainly due to a HK$200 million reduction in impairment reversal of property, plant and equipment. While the park recorded an operating surplus of HK$190.7 million, up 14 percent year on year, Water World continued to bleed money with a HK$148.3 million loss from operations, only a slight improvement on the year before.

Pong said shifting travel habits have hit attendance, with tourists preferring short, “Instagrammable” experiences instead of day-long outings. Despite marketing efforts — including student tickets priced as low as HK$88 and night-time DJ parties — Water World remains “some distance” from breaking even.

The attraction has been closed since mid-October and will not reopen until May. “Unfortunately, the biggest benefit for Water World has come from the seven months it has been closed during the winter,” Pong said.

He added that Ocean Park has consulted overseas and mainland water park operators on possible revamps, with some recommending the addition or removal of facilities.

Water World, opened in 2021 with heavy public funding, was touted as a key part of Ocean Park’s long-term revitalisation plan. But with visitor numbers still falling short of projections, any government takeover or further subsidy could once again leave Hong Kong taxpayers footing the bill for its survival.
 

Haymarket

Well-Known Member
Ocean Park reports $274.7mn losses despite revenue growth driven by giant pandas

22-10-2025 19:46 HKT

by Winona Cheung

Ocean Park's deficit widened to over HK$270 million in the last fiscal year, up from HK$71.6 million the previous year, despite the influx of visitors and revenue spurred by the giant panda craze.

In its 2024/25 fiscal year that ended on June 30, the theme park's total revenue grew by nine percent to HK$1.28 billion, according to the document submitted to the Legislative Council.

Both Ocean Park and Water World have benefited from a continuous surge in visitor numbers to the city and the popularity of the giant pandas. Total attendance and revenue rose for the fourth consecutive year, with total attendance increasing by 10 percent year-on-year to 3.46 million. Notably, the Park recorded a surplus from operations (EBITDA) of HK$42.4 million, turning around from a deficit of HK$17.2 million last year.

Despite this upward trend in attendance, the Park recorded a net loss of over HK$274.7 million for the fiscal year as the loss was exacerbated by a reduction of over HK$200 million in the impairment reversal of property, plant and equipment.

In terms of financial performance, Ocean Park reported an operating surplus of HK$190.7 million, a 14 percent increase from the prior year. As the government's provision of HK$280 million for conservation and education is set to last until the 2025/26 fiscal year, the Park stated that it will continue to aim for a balanced budget and explore measures to generate revenue and reduce expenses.

Water World continued to operate at a loss with a deficit from operations of HK$148.3 million, although this represented a 20 percent decrease from the previous year.

The Park cited reduced attendance during cooler seasons and intense competition from similar facilities in the Greater Bay Area (GBA) as key factors affecting performance. As a result, the Park will revise Water World's business model and explore long-term development strategies.

Ocean Park Chairman Paulo Pong Kin-yee noted that the Park achieved significant breakthroughs in operations, conservation and education this year.

The six giant pandas in the Park have provided leverage for the Park's conservation and education efforts, creating unprecedented opportunities for business growth, he said.

Another theme park, Hong Kong Disneyland Resort, recorded its highest net profit of HK$838 million in its 2024 fiscal year since opening in 2005.
 

Haymarket

Well-Known Member
Editorial | Pandas alone won’t save Hong Kong’s Ocean Park in the long term

The 48-year-old theme park recorded another deficit despite increased visitor numbers. It will have to reinvent itself to survive

SCMP Editorial

Published: 6:45am, 25 Oct 2025

The expanded giant panda family at Ocean Park has done more than bring people joy and warmth. But while it is good that the beloved furry friends continue to draw more visitors from near and far and boost revenues for the cash-strapped theme park, it will take more than the so-called panda economy to save the declining tourism attraction in the longer term.

The 48-year-old brand attracted 10 per cent more visitors year on year, reaching 3.46 million in 2024-25. Locals accounted for most of the park’s attendance, with the number rising by 9 per cent year on year to 2.21 million, or almost two-thirds of the total. The remaining came from other places, including mainland China, the United States, Australia and India, an increase of 12 per cent to 1.25 million. Revenue also grew by 9 per cent to HK$1.28 billion (US$164.7 million), with in-park spending jumping 35 per cent to HK$110.6 million, while merchandising income rose 20 per cent to HK$172.5 million.

Encouraging as this is, the park’s deficit has deepened to HK$274.7 million in the 12 months to June 30 from HK$71.6 million in the same period a year ago, due to higher expenses such as depreciation and losses from the Water World attraction, which recorded a deficit of HK$148.3 million from operations. The park conceded that there is a gap between the concept and the actual performance of the Water World facility and would not rule out the option of the government taking it over to help curb the deficit.

Hit with a ballooning deficit, the theme park has been under growing pressure to reinvent itself in an increasingly competitive leisure and entertainment market. While a lifeline came last year following the timely addition of four giant pandas – two born locally and two gifted from mainland China – the panda fervour will wear off over time.

Just like other tourist hotspots, the theme park must thrive on innovation and appeal. That means reinventing itself as it reaches out to a wider market. This is not easy given the financial constraints and growing competition in the tourism world. But as a home-grown brand with high affinity and support, the park needs more attractions and can’t just pin its hope on pandas for survival and beyond.
 

LameBoi

Well-Known Member
As far as I know the parking lot option is not possible because of strict zoning laws around what can sit above and below an MTR track.
I am not familiar with the specifics but I think if there is a will to expand across the trench towards the parking lot, then a deal could be hammered out between HKDL, MTR, and the govt. Construction wise, it’s not like it’s unfeasible. There is a huge neighborhood with skyscrapers built on top of an existing NYC subway railyard (Hudson Yards). Even Hong Kong has community of skyscrapers built on top of one of its MTR depot.
 

Supersnow84

Well-Known Member
Yep. I’m not holding out for it anytime soon. I’d hate for it to happen just so it happens with minimum investment (WDSP)
I think Disney at least has learned with the 3 post euro Disney parks that you simply cannot underbuild a Disney park

It just remains to be seen how much HK softens this year

7.8 is good, but it’s still still below every other park besides WDS and HK can’t lean on another gate like WDS or DAK can
 

Rush

Well-Known Member
I think they'll fast track an expansion after opening the avengers tower. I see Avatar going on the plot south of Grizzly Peak, possibly the same land/attractions coming to DCA. Beyond the park, an expansion with a water park an a hotel attached would've made much sense if Ocean Park's Water World wasn't flopping and losing money. So unless they shut it down, that's likely not happening. One of the many ideas they've drawn up to expand the resort included a large district hugging the park and reaching the waterfront that includes recreational areas, retail, dining, entertainment, hotels and long stay apartments/villas. The latest plan that went the furtherest would've been a botanical garden and that seems to have fallen through too.
 

Haymarket

Well-Known Member
Regarding Ocean Park, how committed is the HK government to ensuring its survival?

If the government reduces support for Ocean Park, does that likely mean increasing support for HKDL?

If so, is it possible that the government will incentivize Disney to move forward with a second gate with subsidies (part of the theoretical increase of support)?
 

no.swatz

Active Member
Regarding Ocean Park, how committed is the HK government to ensuring its survival?

If the government reduces support for Ocean Park, does that likely mean increasing support for HKDL?

If so, is it possible that the government will incentivize Disney to move forward with a second gate with subsidies (part of the theoretical increase of support)?
I'm not an expert on this but,
1) Not sure how the gov. would ensure OP's survival. They are reducing the budget/subsidy annually starting next year. I don't think it would be a major reduction. On the other hand, I think they (Gov. and BoD for OP) had talks about having a Chinese company to takeover and operate the Water park? This could likely be beneficial for OP? Not sure again.
2) I wouldn't say "increasing" support for HKDL as they've been supporting HKDL since the start of its expansion in 2016 (even when HKDL had deficits).
3) BoD for HKDL and the gov. + secretary of tourism have discussed about bringing back the idea for the second gate and whether its feasible. Again, they will have to monitor the financial progress of HKDL for the upcoming 5 years to ensure that it's feasible to have a second gate, with the additional operating costs for the new expansions.
 

no.swatz

Active Member
1761811967745.png

Large crane spotted over Pixar expansion area. (Credit: @mic_thedisnerd)
 

Supersnow84

Well-Known Member
Hong Kong has to cross 10 million even in the face of softening demand in China before a second gate can really be considered feasible

Parc Disneyland averages 10 million per year and really suffers from WDS sucking up all its budget

Hong Kong needs at least Parc Disneyland numbers to be even remotely feasible
 

no.swatz

Active Member
Hong Kong has to cross 10 million even in the face of softening demand in China before a second gate can really be considered feasible

Parc Disneyland averages 10 million per year and really suffers from WDS sucking up all its budget

Hong Kong needs at least Parc Disneyland numbers to be even remotely feasible
And right now, as of this year, HKDL just reached 7.7 mil visitors for FY2024. Honestly, I'm not sure if it can even maintain this level or even increase with the Pixar and Marvel expansion...
 

Supersnow84

Well-Known Member
And right now, as of this year, HKDL just reached 7.7 mil visitors for FY2024. Honestly, I'm not sure if it can even maintain this level or even increase with the Pixar and Marvel expansion...
8 is about the peak it reached before Shanghai opened. I think it can decently maintain the 7-8 range. But I’m not sure if it can go above that yet right now as it stands
 

no.swatz

Active Member
8 is about the peak it reached before Shanghai opened. I think it can decently maintain the 7-8 range. But I’m not sure if it can go above that yet right now as it stands
Good point. The government will have to closely monitor HKDL's financial progress and could probably tell us the final decision of whether to have the second gate or not after the addition of the Pixar and Marvel expansion (which fills in an additional 1/4 of the plot).
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom