EricsBiscuit
Well-Known Member
Contrast the lethargic pace on this project with Uni’s replacement for RRR.
RRR is just being torn down, and not at a pace any quicker than demolition occurs at Disney. They’ve already cleared tons of land for this project, cleared the courtyard for Monstropolis, and cleared Dinorama for Encanto. None of that demo took very long; it’s the land prep that has been “slow”, though only from a visibility perspective.Contrast the lethargic pace on this project with Uni’s replacement for RRR.
It would be apples to apples if Disney was replacing a bare bones steel coaster with another bare bones steel coaster.Contrast the lethargic pace on this project with Uni’s replacement for RRR.
RRR is just being torn down, and not at a pace any quicker than demolition occurs at Disney. They’ve already cleared tons of land for this project, cleared the courtyard for Monstropolis, and cleared Dinorama for Encanto. None of that demo took very long; it’s the land prep that has been “slow”, though only from a visibility perspective.
Or you could just explain the general backstory with a Hades River Styx E-Ticket Attraction.The Disneyland railroad, with four stations, has a station on average every 500 meters of track. At Magic Kingdom, which has three stations, it's on average every 800 meters. And Disneyland is already a smaller park to cross on foot. It seems like a no-brainer to put a station in Villains Land and bring that average length to 600 feet and give tired guests an option to get from the far back of the park to the front, so they can leave without clogging walkways.
Disneyland also has two incredible dioramas back-to-back, and a diorama would be a great addition to MK's railroad in Villains Land. Not only would it be a cool, unexpected "plussing up" and provide some parity between MK and several other castle parks, but I think it offers a chance to introduce the thematic concept and backstory of Villains Land.
That is, Villains Land will undoubtedly be cool, but it's still a tough concept creatively to bring all the villains together in one realm and rationalize it story-wise. Sure, they can just lean on tropes and motifs and aesthetic design and hand-wave away any need to explain what the place is supposed to be and why it exists, but it will be stronger -- and it's in Imagineering's tradition -- to have a backstory.
But often these backstories, which serve to inspire the Imagineers, can go unknown by guests, leaving them confused by the creative choices in the land. Avenger's Campus is a perfect example: that weird mix of old industrial brick buildings and a modern sleek office park is meaningless and doesn't resonate (i.e., trigger warmth of recognition by guests)...unless you know the backstory that the site was once the location of Stark Industries, and by the way, you have to even know what that is, like Marvel fans do. Other than putting "Stark Industries" logos all over the land, they didn't leave much other evidence of that history (old 1950s rockets or flying cars or anything Howard Stark may have built back then that may be left over).
All that may be a bit of an aside, but the point is backstories are helpful, but Disney can get a better reaction from guests when they actually convey them, and not just use them as a design-process tool.
So, a train diorama leading into Villains Land (and hopefully leading up to a station) is a perfect chance for a diorama to give guests a rich taste of the land's concept and flavor. A narrator could say something like:
"As we venture into this shadowy realm of the Magic Kingdom, we drift off to a land of our fantastical fears and wild imagination. What if the scoundrels, villains, and rogues of enchanting tales had a place to call their own, where they could hatch their dark and devious plans together, shrouded away from the light of goodness and fairness. Do you dare disembark and explore these dark dreams? If so, try to keep your eyes wide for dangers, and don't fall too deep into the sinister slumber of Villain's Land that you don't wake it out."
This, for example, spins the land as a "what-if dream" and not compromising the story cannon of any individual IP. But it's a conceptual backstory and difficult to express through the physical design of the land. That is, it's not easy to come up with architectural, rockwork, or landscaping cues that say "this is all a dream."
A diorama, with special projection effects, along with narration allows that story to be told easier. Using similar techniques to the slightly psychedelic Heffalumps and Woozles scene in the Pooh attraction, the idea that we are falling asleep and having a scary dream could be created in this diorama. We could roll from Frontierland into a forest and in the diorama what initially look like a continuation of forest trees could start to transform into spooky trees right before our eyes...suggesting our "nightmare" is taking over. This would all have to be done at an all-ages level, but enough can be done to tell the story.
A tunnel/diorama setting also allows them to have the trains for a coaster pass over such a tunnel, and extend out over the boundary of the railroad if they need/want to do that. Could be fun to pass over a rocky outcropping and out into a forbidden forest, of sorts...A diorama, with special projection effects, along with narration allows that story to be told easier. Using similar techniques to the slightly psychedelic Heffalumps and Woozles scene in the Pooh attraction, the idea that we are falling asleep and having a scary dream could be created in this diorama. We could roll from Frontierland into a forest and in the diorama what initially look like a continuation of forest trees could start to transform into spooky trees right before our eyes...suggesting our "nightmare" is taking over. This would all have to be done at an all-ages level, but enough can be done to tell the story.
Yes this is true. Overall, as I see it, there's four established ways for Disney to lay out the land, including the "village" of shops, restaurants, general placemaking), the large show buildings (perhaps two), and the railroad passing through.A tunnel/diorama setting also allows them to have the trains for a coaster pass over such a tunnel, and extend out over the boundary of the railroad if they need/want to do that. Could be fun to pass over a rocky outcropping and out into a forbidden forest, of sorts...
Pumps are now visble inside the park, removing the last few puddles of water.
View attachment 879478
Source and more (swipe left for more construction pics):
I feel like they'd be more likely to dig out the island to make it all the same level as the river and build up from there. Put in foundations, etc. Or maybe it's too low in the water table, I don't really know.I wonder if they are just going to bury most of this, once it’s dried out? The river feels like something they just need to fill in, to get the island and Frontierland all at one level for grading etc.
I feel like they'd be more likely to dig out the island to make it all the same level as the river and build up from there. Put in foundations, etc. Or maybe it's too low in the water table, I don't really know.
I wonder if they are just going to bury most of this, once it’s dried out? The river feels like something they just need to fill in, to get the island and Frontierland all at one level for grading etc.
I feel like they'd be more likely to dig out the island to make it all the same level as the river and build up from there. Put in foundations, etc. Or maybe it's too low in the water table, I don't really know.
The water management drawings show the area being filled in with the river bed remaining in place.I’m definitely curious to see what the plan is.
Perhaps they flatten as you mention, and use river level to expand the utilidors for both Cars and Villains? (lol they’d never)
Really? That’s interesting. I wonder if it will crack and cause problems down the road?The water management drawings show the area being filled in with the river bed remaining in place.
Agreed. They will almost certainly be removing the riverboat tracks next, and then breaking up and removing any concrete footings for the track and concrete in the riverbed. It would astonish me if anything were left as-is, and just buried. That would seem extraordinary for a professional, commercial project like this. But we're likely to find out in the next month or so!Really? That’s interesting. I wonder if it will crack and cause problems down the road?
Its fascinating how the two companies work. As we see, Universal is rapidly removing Rockit with a HARD DATE it must be removed.Agreed. They will almost certainly be removing the riverboat tracks next, and then breaking up and removing any concrete footings for the track and concrete in the riverbed. It would astonish me if anything were left as-is, and just buried. That would seem extraordinary for a professional, commercial project like this. But we're likely to find out in the next month or so!
Maybe when these guys are done with Rip Ride Rockit they can pop over and take care of the riverboat tracks.
View attachment 879574
Why would a state licensed civil engineer risk their license and lie to a state water management district over this?Agreed. They will almost certainly be removing the riverboat tracks next, and then breaking up and removing any concrete footings for the track and concrete in the riverbed. It would astonish me if anything were left as-is, and just buried. That would seem extraordinary for a professional, commercial project like this. But we're likely to find out in the next month or so!
Maybe when these guys are done with Rip Ride Rockit they can pop over and take care of the riverboat tracks.
View attachment 879574
Disney has a history of burying former attractions: one of Brickey's videos ("Disneyland Oddities") speaks of where in Disneyland and at Walt Disney World it's approximately where the Persian Resort would have stood.The water management drawings show the area being filled in with the river bed remaining in place.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.