Paris is also a dead end. Actually even more so than WDW.Honestly WDW is the only HM that's at a dead end.
Again, being the old house one the hill is not just a question of elevation.Why not? It can still be the old house on the hill, now I just have the option to also walk right past it... just like at DLR, TDL, HKDL, DLP. Honestly WDW is the only HM that's at a dead end.
Okay so now the HM is that creepy house on the hill everyone passes by "a little quicker" because they are scared of it. The story does not require for one bit that it needs to be a deadend.Again, being the old house one the hill is not just a question of elevation.
Magic Kingdom is not those parks, it has its own unique design.
Being able to walk past something is not the same as it being a weenie. But also, the context isn’t as you present. Disneyland has a different manor design that intentionally downplays the haunted nature but it was also the last major structure along the path when it was built. Payton Manor has a similar siting with spatial separation, there are not multiple paths leading to it. The same mansion structure was intended for Westernland at Tokyo Disneyland but moved to provide a space for Big Thunder Mountain. Tokyo Disneyland also has what is usually considered the weakest placement.
Whoops, i've never actually been thereParis is also a dead end. Actually even more so than WDW.
Ok, so MK is different than any of those parks. Why does MK's HM need to be at a dead end to "work"?Again, being the old house one the hill is not just a question of elevation.
Magic Kingdom is not those parks, it has its own unique design.
Being able to walk past something is not the same as it being a weenie. But also, the context isn’t as you present. Disneyland has a different manor design that intentionally downplays the haunted nature but it was also the last major structure along the path when it was built. Payton Manor has a similar siting with spatial separation, there are not multiple paths leading to it. The same mansion structure was intended for Westernland at Tokyo Disneyland but moved to provide a space for Big Thunder Mountain. Tokyo Disneyland also has what is usually considered the weakest placement.
If they built extra houses around it on the new path, it would lose its creepiness, but I think having forestry around the HM and on the new path (likely to hide the showbuilding) will be enough to keep its feeling of solitary and creepiness.Again, being the old house one the hill is not just a question of elevation.
Magic Kingdom is not those parks, it has its own unique design.
Being able to walk past something is not the same as it being a weenie. But also, the context isn’t as you present. Disneyland has a different manor design that intentionally downplays the haunted nature but it was also the last major structure along the path when it was built. Payton Manor has a similar siting with spatial separation, there are not multiple paths leading to it. The same mansion structure was intended for Westernland at Tokyo Disneyland but moved to provide a space for Big Thunder Mountain. Tokyo Disneyland also has what is usually considered the weakest placement.
I think that’s been the whole point of this thread. I’ve heard of heart attacks friendlier than this thread, lol.Yes, I know. Seems he's being deliberately disingenuous.
Welcome to Disney. Where theming is a thing of the past.You raise a great point, but to me, Tiana’s next to Big Thunder is already quite jarring.
Splash may not have been a perfect fit thematically, but visually it was much more on theme for Frontierland than Tiana’s is.
Perhaps the issue wouldn’t be so pronounced if the Tiana’s and Thunder traded places. I think the problem is the “western town” of Frontierland (Diamond Horseshoe/Country Bears/Pecos Bill) is completely separated from Big Thunder by a New Orleans area.
I just get the vibe that Frontierland will be even worse than Adventureland (in terms of a hodgepodge of settings that don’t flow well into each other).
The joke is on all of us. Disney will do (the stupid) things they will do, no matter what is said here.I think that’s been the whole point of this thread. I’ve heard of heart attacks friendlier than this thread, lol.
It is not about being at a higher elevation or being at a dead-end. Great themed design isn’t just a collection of images and ornamentation, it is storytelling through built space. It’s not just the look of the objects that is important, but how those objects are composed in relation to one another. Why does Town Square feel different than Main Street proper?Ok, so MK is different than any of those parks. Why does MK's HM need to be at a dead end to "work"?
I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this one.It is not about being at a higher elevation or being at a dead-end. Great themed design isn’t just a collection of images and ornamentation, it is storytelling through built space. It’s not just the look of the objects that is important, but how those objects are composed in relation to one another. Why does Town Square feel different than Main Street proper?
Your whole suggestion is built on the incorrect assumption that The Haunted Mansion is supposed to be a weenie drawing people in from different points. It is not. It had a deliberate placement and orientation in relation to Liberty Square and Frontierland that was part of its storytelling. Being a true weenie is a direct contrast to that design intent.
Well… nothing in the concept art tells us anything about the area around haunted mansion and how it will change.nothing in the concept art leads me to believe that won't be the case.
Was it this car?I was reading the new book for Disneylands 70th Anniversary and read this. Per imagineer Marty sklar. “One afternoon in Disneyland a photographer (and I) drove a car behind the scenes to Frontierland to take publicity photos. Walt saw what we were doing and was quite dismayed. “What are you doing with a car here in 1860?” Walt’s point was that we had just destroyed the story.”
And that's why all guests had to take off their shoes and put on genuine leather boots to enter Frontierland.I was reading the new book for Disneylands 70th Anniversary and read this. Per imagineer Marty sklar. “One afternoon in Disneyland a photographer (and I) drove a car behind the scenes to Frontierland to take publicity photos. Walt saw what we were doing and was quite dismayed. “What are you doing with a car here in 1860?” Walt’s point was that we had just destroyed the story.”
That kind of attention to detail died with Walt.I was reading the new book for Disneylands 70th Anniversary and read this. Per imagineer Marty sklar. “One afternoon in Disneyland a photographer (and I) drove a car behind the scenes to Frontierland to take publicity photos. Walt saw what we were doing and was quite dismayed. “What are you doing with a car here in 1860?” Walt’s point was that we had just destroyed the story.”
I’ll settle for Davy Crockett branded crocs.And that's why all guests had to take off their shoes and put on genuine leather boots to enter Frontierland.
Tiana's time frame is sometime after 1927Was it this car?
View attachment 875111
I really miss when CMs would resolve arguments between guests by handing them actual, loaded single action revolvers and making them duel. I also really miss my brother, but what did he expect cutting in front of all those people? Moral of the story: either wait in line like everybody else or be a faster draw.And that's why all guests had to take off their shoes and put on genuine leather boots to enter Frontierland.
I’m truly sorry for your loss. Maybe if he’d seen back to the future: part 3 he would have fared a little better.I really miss when CMs would resolve arguments between guests by handing them actual, loaded single action revolvers and making them duel. I also really miss my brother, but what did he expect cutting in front of all those people? Moral of the story: either wait in line like everybody else or be a faster draw.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.