I'm worried that this has opened the floodgates to build more attractions based on IPs that don't fit in Animal Kingdom. The suggestions of putting Moana in the park are bad enough, but the other day I saw somebody on Instagram, for example, suggest replacing Rafiki's Planet Watch with an Elemental attraction. Do we even SEE any animals in Elemental?
I would argue those gates officially opened November 3, 1998Those gates were opened long ago for all the parks.
Found a preview of the Encanto attraction...
I can see it for anywhere BUT Animal Kingdom so yeah, naturally it's the perfect location.I'm worried that this has opened the floodgates to build more attractions based on IPs that don't fit in Animal Kingdom. The suggestions of putting Moana in the park are bad enough, but the other day I saw somebody on Instagram, for example, suggest replacing Rafiki's Planet Watch with an Elemental attraction. Do we even SEE any animals in Elemental?
It's probably someone like me who is obsessed with getting actual dragons into the park in some way. I wouldn't go that far...I just want them to build Beastly Kingdom in the expansion pad that remains.I'm worried that this has opened the floodgates to build more attractions based on IPs that don't fit in Animal Kingdom. The suggestions of putting Moana in the park are bad enough, but the other day I saw somebody on Instagram, for example, suggest replacing Rafiki's Planet Watch with an Elemental attraction. Do we even SEE any animals in Elemental?
What is that date?I would argue those gates officially opened November 3, 1998
Honestly if Moana were done in the right way including a reef and animal attractions it would have been a lovely fit for the park...Moana also has a theme of caring for the oceans, not robbing from the earth... Harmony and exploration... All things that are a great fit for Animal Kingdom... It actually is a better fit than Pandora which is not even based on this planet...I'm worried that this has opened the floodgates to build more attractions based on IPs that don't fit in Animal Kingdom. The suggestions of putting Moana in the park are bad enough, but the other day I saw somebody on Instagram, for example, suggest replacing Rafiki's Planet Watch with an Elemental attraction. Do we even SEE any animals in Elemental?
More Tropical Americas Permits Filed: Restaurantosaurus and DinoLand Meet-and-Greet Included
![]()
More Tropical Americas Permits Filed: Restaurantosaurus and DinoLand Meet-and-Greet Included
More Tropical Americas Permits Filed: Restaurantosaurus and DinoLand Meet-and-Greet Includedwww.wdwmagic.com
But Moana isn't about animals, and I highly doubt that any hypothetical Moana attraction would have Moana and Maui talking about animals and the environment.Honestly if Moana were done in the right way including a reef and animal attractions it would have been a lovely fit for the park...Moana also has a theme of caring for the oceans, not robbing from the earth... Harmony and exploration... All things that are a great fit for Animal Kingdom... It actually is a better fit than Pandora which is not even based on this planet...
Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V are their friendsThe people who do permits for this site will be thrilled at the closing of Restaurantosaurus since it is really hard to type "Restaurantosaurus".![]()
But Moana isn't about animals, and I highly doubt that any hypothetical Moana attraction would have Moana and Maui talking about animals and the environment.
So, as long as they don't include a Hades attraction, we're good?For me, Animal Kingdom is about… life.
Isn’t Animal Kingdom about much more than just animals? Isn’t it at the core about earth, nature, conservation. The intrinsic value of nature.
Animal Kingdom could really allude to and be showcasing so many things about our planet.
For me, Animal Kingdom is about… life. Our living planet.
So, as long as they don't include a Hades attraction, we're good?![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.