

Which is the better ride? Expedition Everest at Animal Kingdom or Space Mountain at Disneyland? This is of course the amazing Disneyland version, and not the much much weaker, rickety version at Magic Kingdom.
But there is contest in some ways. I love the on-board audio on Space Mountain at Disneyland and the comfy and cooler ride vehicles (Everest's are uncomfortable) as well as the tunnels and effects throughout. Everest also STILL has a broken embarrassing audio-animatronic that has a strobe light dancing on it. A ride having it's main centerpiece broken for over 20 years now is quite lame. Even more lame on how the whole ride is hyping up encountering the Yeti so most expect it to be impressive only for it to be static and non-functional. A good half of it's effects but especially the Yeti do not work and have been broken for years now. I get what you're saying that the layout is kind of repetitive as a coaster, but it's still fun and the overall experience start to finish is just so much better to me. Plus, Everest is too intense and unenjoyable for some people. It's backwards section is good for people that can handle that and enjoy positive G-forces. I've heard and read so many people that didn't end up liking Everest and describing it as "uncomfortable" and "punishing" rather than thrilling due to it's nauseating backwards section.One ride consists of turn, ramp, turn. The other is one of the most thrilling mine coasters with a great backwards section. One is nearly 4 min long, the other much shorter. There is no contest.
This.DL Space Mtn. is a joyful, comfortable, exhilarating ride complemented by one of the best onboard music scores ever.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.