Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
All this talk about bad sightlines around the perimeter of Universal's new $7.5 Billion theme park tells me Disnerds would rather not talk about what is in said theme park.
All this talk about bad sightlines around the perimeter of Universal's new $7.5 Billion theme park tells me Disnerds would rather not talk about what is in said theme park.
If one side wishes sightlines and theming were better and the other dismisses those issues entirely, I know which one sounds a lot more like shilling and which side I’d rather be on, regardless of which company built a park.All this talk about bad sightlines around the perimeter of Universal's new $7.5 Billion theme park tells me Disnerds would rather not talk about what is in said theme park.
If one side wishes sightlines and theming were better and the other dismisses those issues entirely, I know which one sounds a lot more like shilling and which side I’d rather be on, regardless of which company built a park.
I have to wait? What if it is already happening?Just wait until Universal botches the park ops this summer.
You and a few others are making it tribal. Most commenting consistently point out theming flaws and immersion breaks regardless of the perpetrator. That you are incapable of separating criticism from Disney vs. Universal tribalism does not mean it is so for others.Why must there be tribalism at all?
I had a chance to visit the park for the first time this past Monday during the Team member previews. Since I worked on the project for close to 2 years, I knew much of what everything was intended to be and many of the realities and challenges of building something like this. I managed the commissioning of the first building on the site. The visit was enabled by a member of the team I used to work in, so it was fun to get some 'war stories' that would have significance only to us.
It is a beautiful park and I was glad that most everything that was planned made it into the real world and we'll all get to enjoy it. Including a few things that when we initially heard of them, we suspected were traps to see who was leaking things to social media. They were regularly setting those sorts of traps in internal presentations.
No park has an unlimited, budget and there are always compromises and decisions that have to be made to stay on budget and schedule no matter who is building it. There are certainly a few places where if you are obsessed with finding faults and obsess over them, you can find them. I found myself looking for things that I knew were going to be challenging to see how they managed to resolve the issues with it. But even though I knew they were there and looked for some in the final build, I chose to not let that compromise my experience while visiting the park. I would encourage everyone to not obsess over those items, and keep their focus on what has been built and the quality of it.
Unfortunately, because of the virtual queue, we were not able to get on Ministry of Magic which was disappointing but it's not like I will not be back (actually going to AP preview on Saturday) everything else seemed well fleshed out and operating well.
Universal will have a lot to learn in the coming weeks/months with guest flows and attraction reliability to learn how to manage things. All of that is totally normal for something new like this opening up to the public. The TM previews are a good stress test of things but when the general guests started today with Passholder previews the guest profile changes and that will trigger another learning curve.
If you get the opportunity to visit, I encourage you to not go into it looking for things that are wrong or missed- just enjoy the first new full theme park built in Orlando for a couple of decades (water parks don't count). Personally, I don't think you'll regret just letting yourself enjoy it.
Universal has been beset with the same sort of disfunction that has long plagued Disney. They are no longer the company that stretched a dollar. They had the resources available. Some of the issues are just one of planning, things that should have been solved long ago when the cost was related to moving things around on paper.You’re assuming they had the budget to fix the issues you have called out, without cutting back on something else.
I’d say Epcot and DAK have lots of great entertainmentThat is ebb and flow in everything. Especially with food and entertainment.
But IOA/Universal Studios and especially now EPIC have far superior Entertainment operations than Disney parks, particularly WDW and specifically Hollywood Studios.(which is almost back to entertainment offering count it had a decade ago since Mermaid and other venues have been shuttered)
So not sure how you can say this is where you weigh your value but feel they are some of the sloppiest in operation. Live Entertainment is one of the places Studios and IOA are simply the best of the major in Orlando.
MK- Barber shop quartet, Casey’s piano player, Main Street PhilharmonicMarvel Characters, Potter Frog Choir, Potter Tri Wizard, Olivanders, Hogwarts Express Train conductor, Raptor Encounter, Mystic Fountain, Madagascar characters, Seuss characters(and small shows in Seuss)
Blues Brothers, Beat Builders, Diagon Alley's stage shows, Money Exchange, Olivanders Marilyn Manroe, Parade, Horror Make Up Show, Animal Actors, Dreamworks show, and Bourne, Spongebob characters, Dreamworks
Compare those to EPCOT and Animal Kingdom and I don't know how you can think that the entertainment line up there is much better.
AK has two big stage spectacles...but to me that does not compare nor variety.
You are not nuts, but no accounting for taste.
Certainly silly to think of Uni's entertainment operation is weakest. And this is from someone who feels the park needs the stunt show and poseidon.
You seem to be a sit down theater show person.
It isn't surprise being close despite AK having more land than Epic Universe. Pandora originally was planned to have 3 attractions, not 2. Also the nature of AK includes animals and that means some of AK's land is not made for attractions and that means a good amount of the land is for the Animals AK has.Its surprisingly close though for a 20 year old park vs a new park. Its basically even right now if we cut out things that aren't open yet (encanto, zootopia, and carousel) at 15 vs 16 attractions each
DAK
vs EPIC
- Affection Section
- Animation experience
- FOP
- Conservation Station
- Dino/Indy
- Discovery Island Trails
- Everest
- Feathered friends
- FotLK
- Nemo
- Gorilla Falls
- Kali
- Kilimanjaro
- Jungle Trek
- Na'vi
- Wildlife express train
- Zootopia
- Encanto
- Carousel
- Astronomica
- Le Cirque Arcanus
- Constellation Carousel
- Curse of the Werewolf
- Dragon Racer's Rally
- Fyre Drill
- Harry Potter and the Battle at the Ministry
- Hiccup's Wing Gliders
- Mario Kart: Bowser’s Challenge
- Mine-Cart Madness
- Monsters Unchained: The Frankenstein Experiment
- Stardust Racers
- The Untrainable Dragon
- Viking Training Camp
- Yoshi's Adventure
That’s my take also, in a perfect world with unlimited money, unlimited space, unlimited resources, unlimited time, etc both Disney and Uni could build perfect parks, we don’t live in that world though.You’re assuming they had the budget to fix the issues you have called out, without cutting back on something else.
Video of one of the dragon drones:
I wouldn't be surprised if it's piloted based on waypoints which most enterprise drones have, the pilot would just monitor the flight & takeover on the landing if it doesn't have auto land.The pilots did great today!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.