nickys
Premium Member
1. That’s the initial plan.I can’t get over the fact they are only building 500 hotel rooms.
2. London is close by, with thousands of hotels and millions of hotel rooms.
1. That’s the initial plan.I can’t get over the fact they are only building 500 hotel rooms.
No SLoP in Minions because it's getting its own land on the left-side of the concept art. Check out the coaster, "Secret Life of Pets: Max Speed".No Secret life of Pets in Minions land. It’s almost a 1:1 with Beijing’s concept art. Meaning Sing on Tour and minions mayhem.
I suspect you’ve been a bit too positive elsewhere as well.
1. That’s the initial plan.
2. London is close by, with thousands of hotels and millions of hotel rooms.
Interesting, I really do hope they have some British themed areas and attractions unique to the park. A middle earth land would be great and help fill the potter gapNo indication of how reliable the source is here, but it suggests LotR and Bond could already have contracts signed.
![]()
James Bond and Paddington could star at Universal UK
Lord of the Rings and 007 – but not Harry Potter – are expected at the Bedfordshire theme park.www.bbc.co.uk
And if not LotR then Wicked is also an option. More kid orientated though.Interesting, I really do hope they have some British themed areas and attractions unique to the park. A middle earth land would be great and help fill the potter gap
A rough back of a beer mat sketch of medium term plots; red in existing parks. Yellow hotels. Green 3rd park.Doesn't Disney have some undeveloped land near DLP?
Universal Kids Resort has a 300 key hotel. That should be telling about the scope and scale of this project.By all means, that was Eisner’s folly with Euro Disneyland.
But we’re talking 500 versus 5800. It strikes me as an insane reduction or extreme caution. I’m just surprised there’s no 1000 bed value.
The park is less than an hour from London. The vast majority of visitors will stay there, or in Oxford, Cambridge etc and travel to the park. And I put money on more hotels springing up nearby to attract those who want to stay overnight nearer to the park.Universal Kids Resort has a 300 key hotel. That should be telling about the scope and scale of this project.
The park is less than an hour from London. The vast majority of visitors will stay there, or in Oxford, Cambridge etc and travel to the park. And I put money on more hotels springing up nearby to attract those who want to stay overnight nearer to the park.
Universal Kids Resort has a 300 key hotel. That should be telling about the scope and scale of this project.
The park is less than an hour from London. The vast majority of visitors will stay there, or in Oxford, Cambridge etc and travel to the park. And I put money on more hotels springing up nearby to attract those who want to stay overnight nearer to the park.
I’m well aware of its location. This isn’t going to be a huge park.The park is less than an hour from London. The vast majority of visitors will stay there, or in Oxford, Cambridge etc and travel to the park. And I put money on more hotels springing up nearby to attract those who want to stay overnight nearer to the park.
Correct, it’s not that small but it’s still aiming to be more cost effective than Beijing or the South Campus. Even the announcement indicates they expect it to do less business than Universal Studios Hollywood.Though I don’t think this indicates the park is inferior by that order of magnitude like it does Universal Kids. But rather it’s a soft vote of cost containment and caution upfront. Which will likely lead to one or two further cut backs in the final product. Ironically I don’t see how Waterworld jives with the claim the park is only 4 lands plus the hub.
Compared to the other Universal parks, no it isn’t big. Compared to most European theme parks though, it seems like it might be double the size, even if they only use half the land they’ve purchased. Certainly they’re aiming to be the biggest.I’m well aware of its location. This isn’t going to be a huge park.
Correct, it’s not that small but it’s still aiming to be more cost effective than Beijing or the South Campus. Even the announcement indicates they expect it to do less business than Universal Studios Hollywood.
Correct, it’s not that small but it’s still aiming to be more cost effective than Beijing or the South Campus. Even the announcement indicates they expect it to do less business than Universal Studios Hollywood.
I think the problem here is you are all thinking way too big here. This is not Orlando! UK visitors go to Orlando for 2-3 weeks in the sun. There they visit theme parks a lot of their time.
Universal are deciding to open a park in Europe. And thanks to some deals on infrastructure they’ve settled on Bedford, some 60 miles from London and right in the middle of 2 other tourist magnet cities.
The U.K. have theme parks already! Alton Towers at one point had more rides than Universal Orlando. But they too only have around 510 hotel rooms on site. Because the vast majority of U.K. visitors go for the day. It’s a day out. Schools take kids there after exam time. Families head there for the day. When it’s nice! Even if they stay nearby they seek out a cheap hotel room at a Travelodge, Premier In or Holiday Inn and drive to the park for the day.
Could it possibly be that Universal have studied the ways of U.K. visitors to theme parks and are thinking they’ll follow the same pattern here? But also obviously looking to be an international destination so catering to those that want to stay onsite. As numbers grow they may build further resorts of their own.
Like I said though, I fully expect every hotel chain to be opening at least one hotel near by. And Universal are probably banking on that. Rather than over- building on resorts only to find the cheap-skate Brits are staying at the Travelodge at £50 a night.
By 2030 when this has taken shape, I’m quite sure hotels will have been built all around the area with hundreds more rooms for visitors.
Alton and even Thorpe appear to be bigger. Alton of course has positioned itself as a destination resort.Compared to the other Universal parks, no it isn’t big. Compared to most European theme parks though, it seems like it might be double the size
I’m not even really complaining or being cynical. Universal has done the thing so many complain about with Disney, they’ve announced very early in the design process and released surprising clear art. This looks similar to the Epic Universe art, and that was released nearer to the end of its design process. It also still lost offerings between then and now. It’s a lot of hype that doesn’t really align with the project.You are correct of course.
But our complaint was never that it isn’t Orlando, but that it isn’t Beijing or Shanghai or Paris.
It seems to be more Hong Kong+… and I adore Hong Kong, but it took a while.
And Universal is expecting to do 3.6x the visitation of Alton Towers in their first year.Alton and even Thorpe appear to be bigger. Alton of course has positioned itself as a destination resort.
But other than “theme park fans” they probably aren’t going to attract Europeans to visit in the same way that Universal will.Alton and even Thorpe appear to be bigger. Alton of course has positioned itself as a destination resort.
Hong Kong Disneyland is probably the best similarity. The problem is that includes the whole package of trying to do a smaller, cheaper park that leverages existing concepts with expectations that don’t align to that scale.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.