mickEblu
Well-Known Member
You seemed to generally be expressing some form of discontent, correct?
If so, what am I incorrect about?
So discontent = has no place ? So a huge portrait front and center is the only way to go about it?
You seemed to generally be expressing some form of discontent, correct?
If so, what am I incorrect about?
What would you have preferred?So discontent = has no place ? So a huge portrait front and center is the only way to go about it?
What would you have preferred?
To be fair, most people haven't hated on the interior yet, the shop just opened yesterday.Something a little less obvious and in your face. It would seem that they included that for super fans like us or maybe it’s just Kim’s tribute to her mom. If it’s the former, I feel that it kind of misses the mark and diminishes cool factor/ mystique a bit.
Disney using your face for a disembodied head in a Crystal ball in one of their greatest attractions ever built = very cool
Huge realistic portrait in a universally hated gift shop places by imagineers who are over mining nostalgia and the great work of the imagineers that came before them because they lack the talent to stand on their own = less cool.
If you check the many video tours released online, the portrait isn’t front and center. It’s placed above the doorframe of the main entrance to the shop, almost in the rafters, so it passes unnoticed by the general guest and definitely isn’t in your face. I would honestly equate it to seeing Harold in the Guardians queue, as he’s pretty obvious if you know where he is, but only until he is pointed out. For the average guest it’s just a photo of a mysterious lady, along with a bunch of other portraits of haunted mansion characters along the wall. I will have to say though I am very disappointed that Disney actually user AI for some the portraits?So discontent = has no place ? So a huge portrait front and center is the only way to go about it?
Disney doesn't have any in-house artists anymore.So a little sleuthing later and it seems that some of the artwork inside was purchased from Redbubble and was AI generated.
View attachment 832523View attachment 832524
Is it? A fog machine would require refilling, this doesn’t appear to be a fog machine. It looks more like a liquid to me.I really like this tweet. Like is it not just a fog machine with spinning lights and a fan? What about this is hard to figure out?
It’s not a fact.Did FreshBaked seriously delete his piece about the shed being found online? Though he had a little more integrity than that. I'm disappointed as he was the most mainstream source reporting that fact!
Looks like rheoscopic fluid with a light and motor.Is it? A fog machine would require refilling, this doesn’t appear to be a fog machine. It looks more like a liquid to me.
But it isn't actually a fact. It's speculation that Disney used a kit to build the shop, and he reported it as fact. I think removing a video that stated something he couldn't prove shows he does have integrity. He's probably just as annoyed as the rest of us about the look of that monstrosity of a shop and jumped the gun with that video. That's my speculation anyway.Did FreshBaked seriously delete his piece about the shed being found online? Though he had a little more integrity than that. I'm disappointed as he was the most mainstream source reporting that fact!
It obviously can't literally be one of those kits because they've clearly built and installed a permanent structure. What they clearly did is they just ripped those off, so what's the difference?It’s not a fact.
They actually resorted to shoving AI slop inside this building, just to get it over with! Why would everything else about it be hard to believe?So a little sleuthing later and it seems that some of the artwork inside was purchased from Redbubble and was AI generated.
View attachment 832523View attachment 832524
The kits are also permanent structures. There are multiple kits of the same basic design because it is a common design. They’re all imitations of the same thing.It obviously can't literally be one of those kits because they've clearly built and installed a permanent structure. What they clearly did is they just ripped those off, so what's the difference?
Nice deflection. His argument was that the painting it was stylistically wrong for the Mansion. It's okay to ignore it though, because it's a reference we recognize so we can clap to our hearts content?That’s a portrait of Leota “Toombs” Thomas, the Disney Legend imagineer and inspiration behind Leota herself. It’s a very wholesome reference imoView attachment 832362
Nice deflection. His argument was that the painting it was stylistically wrong for the Mansion. It's okay to ignore it though, because it's a reference we recognize so we can clap to our hearts content?
The painting is corny. It's not an earned callback or sincere. It's just to get brownie points from forums like this one! The whole shop is kitsche of kitsche.
Yeah, they sell these at places like TJ Max and Home Goods. The fact that the base fully connects to the base makes it even less magical as any magician can tell you that the appearance of the magical element being isolated makes it more impactful. Having a globe attached to a table with a 5-7 inch base isn't all that mystifying. Especially as they could have easily built a tiny pepper's ghost hologram that could be interactive or randomized to show different 3-dimensional objects within the globe.Looks like rheoscopic fluid with a light and motor.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.