If there's another fatality, Disney will hopefully know better than to try a legal argument of 'you once signed up for Disney+, you must arbitrate.'
If it had just been the Disney Parks clause to arbitrate, it never would have gotten traction in the media.
My guess is this is a legal argument that they want to test. They chose the wrong case. A broken ankle tripping in Disney Springs, better time to test. An allergy related death when Disney prides itself on its allergen procedures, even when its not a Disney restaurant, is just a bad public...
They absolutely should know. Unfortunately there's a lot that I have witnessed in restaurants regarding preparation and reading labels that if I had a severe allergy, I'd probably never eat at a restaurant.
I get it, because I have also looked at the menu, and haven't seen anything with nuts on it, unless there's a seasonal item, or the menu has changed. The autopsy said both dairy and nuts being detected, so that is one thing I'm curious about.
My guess is poor communication between the server...
The fritter, I think the scallops, and another article said onion rings were eaten as well are all fryer foods. The fryer is often forgotten as a point of cross contamination.
From the widowers statement, they had conferred several times with the waiter that the food could be made to...
Oh I absolutely get that, but American Airlines just tried a bad PR move in a legal briefing to try to CYA, and now AA has gotten rid of a legal team.
Someone else here used the term 'novel' and I agree this could be novel in how arbitration is handled for these large conglomerates. If this...
I agree that Disney has a special, unique relationship beyond just landlord-tenant, and I think Disney could potentially be included in liability.
Most of us here on the forums know all the different levels of what is Disney, what is third party, etc., but would the common, reasonable person...