Recent content by LoisMustDie

Holy moly...if they ever came out with this one I'll be incapacitated for months on end. (Yeah right...as if my OTHER WDW CDs weren't enough...)

For one who has so much faith: how do you propose they make this MI attraction, using the same UOE vehicles, and keep it exciting for 45 minutes, not to mention keeping it unique for more than a decade?

So guys do u think that IJA will happen?????????????????????????? Its still a possibility right????????????????? Does anyone know??????????????????? :rolleyes:

Are you serious? MI is a movie. Movies have sound effects. Am I missing something here? Actually, I think MI has the greatest potential as a sound-effects show than most anything else. Think of the possibilities. Except Epcot is not the park where the popular movies have attractions. MGM...

I'd assume they would put this under the maintenance budget...unless they have a seperate budget for transportation (being a really-for-real car) for each park.

SaveDisney has safely executed step one of their "oust Iger" campaign. Late yesterday, Chancellor William Candler of the Delaware Courts has thrown out TWDC's motion to dismiss the charges made by Roy Disney and Stanley Gold that accused the Disney Company of fooling its shareholders into...

Thanks for your responses Thrawn...and I'm pretty close to 100% sure those perimeter launchers were there when I visited two years ago.

Also strange is how everyone is begging for a new attraction at IOA, while the park is crumbling down around them. Maybe the funds should go to maintenance? I guess Eddie Sotto was right. From someone also going to visit SWW for the first time: is there anything special I should be looking to...

A thousand pardons if my opinions offend you. For your convenience, the moderators have placed a handy-dandy "ignore" button for times such as this. Or, you could not resort to second-grade lunchroom insults and just ignore my posts altogether. I don't see how you think that this little...

Rumored to replace WOL: Wonders of Stitch! It has absolutely nothing to do with Epcot...but hey...Stitch, right? ;) ...Please don't shoot me...

Eh? Is this sarcasm? Because all of my points were relevant to the quotes posted. Which would have been fine, except that you added the postscript "or have they," implying that they did, unless that was also sarcasm. Actually no. AEfx has already answered this point, so I won't reiterate...

Oh God...let's not start that again, shall we? :brick:

No, that's not what we're saying. WDW should not be targeting LOCAL guests (who visit once a year or more), not all repeat guests. In fact, WDW hopes for guests to come every 3-5 years, so they can spend more money on passes, hotels, restaurants, merchandise, etc than the locals, who only buy...

That's because HM is 34 years old. An attraction that gets the Fastpass treatment and is that old isn't going anywhere. Now, WWTBAM just turned four years old. Isn't pulling FP from what should still be a fairly new attraction have you worried? To me, that's saying that Disney overestimated...

I don't think ITTBAB can be considered "classic." And how is it the signature attraction at Animal Kingdom? The Safaris are by far the "signature attraction."