It was controversial but accepted because it was an overall plus to the park and you didn't lose the River or the Island (Pirates Lair).
If DL considered removing the entire thing we'd have a serious revolt.
Yes, its the ride system. Its the worst one they have. Shaking you back and forth is not entertaining, exciting, thrilling, scary, whatever words you want to use. The concussion simulator attractions are bad.
Oh **** I misquoted it. Its supposed to be 'MINUS FIVE STARS'
And describing Dinosaur as 'beloved' is absolutely insane. Can't wait for it to be gone and never mentioned again.
Dinosaur is a horrible attraction. Far, far worse than Indy at DLR, which I don't like either. I rode Dino on my latest trip just because I knew I would never see it again, and it was even worse than I remembered. I think IJA is about a 2/10, Dino is NEGATIVE FIVE STARS.
If its even 1/10th of...
Have never heard of or thought that before. The Destination D events had themes originally, the first one was Disneyland 55, then WDW 40, then 75 years of animation.
The majority of customers aren't complaining here, though. Only the most devoted and deluded few that were expecting things that were never promised. They hyped themselves up to expect things that Disney never mentioned.
I don't know exactly what you're talking about here with calling it a...
But it was. They had extra time and more panels than the other Destination D events.
Again, you're still doing the same thing. Yes, it said 'new projects and attractions'. But it said 'hear from the people behind new projects and attractions'. It was one sentence. You're the one misinterpreting...
If the package says 'This Twix is green' and you buy it and complain that the Twix isn't both green and has nuts, that's a you problem.
Thats more akin to what happened here than your example.
Reading 'hear from the people behind new projects' and interpreting it as 'they're going to announce new projects' is a YOU problem, not a Disney problem.
They cut nothing. We got more than I expected.