Search results

If you have no issues getting the DAS fairly, why are you so adamant about defending those who would do so unfairly? I see you're worried about potential data leaks, and I'm not going to downplay that its possible, but you've already claimed 'HIPAA' regarding this, which means you don't really...

This has nothing to do with HIPAA. At all.

You're missing that they can go wait in line in a second attraction while they wait for their DAS time for the first attraction.

I think the best chance you have at getting an exact date is @marni1971

Also, looks like they're starting at 4PM PDT, they must expect it to go long. The last two meetings with DLF as the main subject went 7+ hours and 9+ hours.

The overall plan will be approved. Its just the closure of Magic Way that might not be approved. Or it will be approved by a small margin.

I don't think thats hyperbole. The issue will be the closure of Magic Way. It will be the sticking point brought up ad nauseum, and Disneyland Forward will have to be drastically altered if that closure is not allowed. The locals who use it as a cut through to get onto the highway will be out...

No

August, in Orlando, in the afternoon? Chances are above 70% that there would be cloud cover if not storms during the event.

You don't move your announcement from after close to before open if you're going to announce bad news. Same reason why lots of things (not only Disney, but politics, companies, etc) are announced Friday at 4. So the news cycle has moved on. A 5:00 release lets the numbers settle overnight...

And because, you know, its a vastly superior experience than WDW.

It almost has to be all sectors. The market has an obsession with the streaming numbers, but it would still look bad if they make a profit on streaming but miss on parks.

You don't make this swap unless the numbers are good. If they were bad you would just leave as is.

He DOES NOT ever advocate for increasing spending on the parks. He advocates for scrutinizing the $60b promised investments. (So he can later advocate against spending it.) Those two things are NOT the same. And you really think they are, and you're not just trolling, I feel sad for you. And...

Please find one instance. Only one. Any one. Of Nelson Peltz encouraging a company he was an active investor and/or on the Board of to increase spending on any part of that company's business. You won't. Because it doesn't exist. You can try to label it as an opinion, but its fact based on...

You're not getting it. He would cut the parks spending too. It was just a lie to fool people like you.

That's exactly why he wanted to know where it would be spent. No matter what it was, he would have said that was a bad use of the money.

Do you believe everything anyone says (like a politician)? Just because you say something doesn't make it true. He was never going to support if his platform was 'cut everything and then take profits'. But since it was 'cut everything except the parks and restore magic by looking at parks...

They'd be crazy to not have him on call for the next CEO, whoever it is.

They will talk endlessly about the first woman to run the biggest entertainment company in history. Iger gets to say he picked her to succeed him, and as pointed out before, Chapek was the one who put her in her current position, so Iger doesn't get any backlash for cronyism.