GoofGoof
Premium Member
We can’t have our cake and eat it too. If asymptomatic infection is rare than the umber of people infected is roughly equal to the number of people who tested positive. If it’s not rare than many more people were infected than the number testing positive. We are assuming there is a lot more natural immunity than just the 10% who tested positive and many studies have shown that to be true. If that’s not the case then we really probably should delay some of the decisions beimg made right now.![]()
Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is 'very rare,' WHO says
Government responses should focus on detecting and isolating infected people with symptoms, said the WHO's Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove.www.cnbc.com
On paper I would think the same as you, but the data seem to potentially show otherwise. Not that I have a lot of faith in the WHO, but they seem to believe asymptomatic spread is rare. A lot of people have symptoms but no fever.