Brer Oswald
Well-Known Member
He’s currently petting his cat on his rolling chair, amused at his brilliant decision to pull out right before the shutdowns hit.Well... Iger *could* be sitting the dark stewing in shame!
He’s currently petting his cat on his rolling chair, amused at his brilliant decision to pull out right before the shutdowns hit.Well... Iger *could* be sitting the dark stewing in shame!
Of course they do. Layoffs cut costs and increase profitability. It's short term thinking usually, but it's how they tend to think.Really?
Simple is good and your reply was appreciated.That's what Net Positive means as per the definition they are using. If they can cover at least the variable costs then they are better off staying open than being closed. EG. If fixed costs are $100, and I can sell a ticket for $120, with variable costs of $110, I am covering my variable costs and contributing $10 towards fixed cost. Not a way to run a business long term obviously, but in the short term, given the current world situation, it's the best of the possible worst-case scenarios.
PS - sorry if I'm insulting your intelligence with the simple example. Not my intention at all, but I don't know your level of financial literacy
Disney is fine.
One thing Disney absolutely needs is knockout D+ and Hulu subscriber growth. Disney announced back in May that D+ had around 51 million subs. Say they absolutely killed it and are close to 80 million subscribers. Hulu likewise experiences the same growth, but sorry, I don't recall their sub numbers off hand. With this momentum they can definitely abate some of the pain from the parks. Because of the value that Wall St places on subscriber businesses that lose lots of money, this could even save the stock. Even while DTC is losing tons of money, the revenue still good cash in the till.
Disney's cash position could also be better than expected. They raised $11 billion in debt since the last earnings report. Not inconceivable they have a better cash/cash equivalents position than we speculate. Perhaps north of $12 billion. The caveat here is that they are burning thru this cash at an astonishing rate. This is not in question. "When does the cash burn end?" That's the first question. "Is it worth continuing to loan money to this company if they can't answer the cash burn question?" is the second one.
If you say so - same post:But please, keep telling me how I got it all wrong.![]()
You just hedged across the board with a bunch of what ifs that didn't also come true.I've been giving consideration to what could go right for Disney on earnings day tomorrow vs the obvious catastrophes. And I do see a few ways they can avoid a total stock collapse.
In truth, Disney is probably getting their face ripped off tomorrow.
They haven’t checked the safe in a few days. I did leave them a few Hamiltons. Figured it would help them feel better.$23 Billion cash on hand.
I'm not making this post in an accusatory way. Particularly because as Animaniac93-98 said, earnings reports are glorified PR stunts intended to paint as ideal of a picture as legally possible to pitch to existing and potential investors. So I didn't expect your bolder comments to be represented in the report (i'd have been surprised if they had been in fact). That said, i do want to know if anything in the report caused you to change your mind about any of your previous comments. Particularly the following (and if you have further clarifying details or can say if/when we would have heard about these things officially)-Worth nothing that these two positive items I highlighted in a post last night were indeed the headlines of the day that saved their report.
But please, keep telling me how I got it all wrong.![]()
What you are about to see from WDC will be shocking and it will permanently change their business forever. The bloat is about to be gone. The mediocrity that's failed upward all our lives is about to be purged. A new company is emerging.
And that brings me to Bob Iger. Mr. Chairman. Mr. Gotta Put Yoda on His Wife's Dress to Bury Some Search Engine Leads. That guy. It is my pleasure to announce that he will be soon tossed on his ***. In disgrace. His sins, his poor judgement, his poor treatment of subordinates. His malicious temper and outrageous displays of "toxic masculinity" as the kids call it. All this and more is coming out. Good riddance.
On Splash Mt... I don't think its ever gonna happen.
Layoffs at Walt Disney Imagineering and Universal Creative are not necessarily something that would be reported because they could get rid of people who are not “employees” or not extend contracts. Recall the post-Shanghai Disneyland layoffs at Walt Disney Imagineering where the workforce was reduced more than those laid off because of these contractors and project hires.
LOLRight, but, by your mentioning them as common knowledge, that's an example of layoffs that were not secret, but well known.
We're being told such no-longer-hirings have just happened and are not only not announced, but kept secret... by NDAs.
This strikes me as exactly right. It's not all pixie dust and princesses right now, but it's not all doom and gloom either. Disney did a decent job navigating a disaster of epic proportions. There are more challenges ahead and it will be a long time before they come out of this, but they positioned themselves decently, have plenty of cash, etc...As usual, the truth will be somewhere between the OP’s doom and gloom and a pixie duster’s alternate reality.
For the parks, as I’ve said before, they announced there were reopening, bookings were fine, then COVID cases spiked and travel restrictions appeared, causing many cancellations. They briefly considered reclosing until COVID numbers started improving. Now, with the state and local government’s blessing, they are no longer entertaining reclosure, so we are in a phase of mitigating losses. They will continue pushing off resorts reopening until they are needed, will perhaps (probably) cut hours in September, and use this to show improvement in the next quarter. Pushing off current projects a quarter or two, trimming excessive details in Epcot projects, and employing a number of CMs appropriate to guest levels is prudent. Bookings are healthy in 2021.
In the end, the BRAND is strong. People want to go. And they will. The company will survive.
Universal has a slightly more perilous situation but will also be fine. They opened earlier and suffered more as COVID spiked. Now, more locals are going to WDW because they’ve “been there, done that” with masks at Universal. WDW is more novel. And if there was ever any doubt, Central Florida vacationers come, first and foremost, to Walt Disney World. There’s more nostalgia. So for those who want to get a vacation away from COVID, most are choosing WDW.
Sometimes, you have to say, “does this pass the smell test?” Someone makes it out like the parks are closing up shop the same week as Disney recommences construction on multiple major projects that are underway. If you are ready to close up shop, do you send workers back to Ratatouille, Guardians, Play, other Epcot projects, Tron, Grand pathway, Toy Story restaurant, etc.? Do you still open your largest moderate resort? Do you work to bring new entertainment to DHS? Do you unveil new product lines? C’mon.
With that said, I do think they need to wake up and start offering discounts to help promote more bookings. No brainer. A $5000 vacation that has been discounted is better for the company than a $6000 vacation that people don’t book.
I'm not making this post in an accusatory way. Particularly because as Animaniac93-98 said, earnings reports are glorified PR stunts intended to paint as ideal of a picture as legally possible to pitch to existing and potential investors. So I didn't expect many (if any) of your predictions to be represented in the report. That said, i do want to know if you've changed your mind about any of your previous comments. Particularly the following (and if you have further clarifying details or can say if/when we would have heard about these things officially)-
Layoffs haven’t happened yet (according to him), Iger was a no show, and Splash (or any theme park additions/changes) weren’t discussed. The only reason for his opinion to change would be based on what his sources tell him. Not on the earnings report.I'm not making this post in an accusatory way. Particularly because as Animaniac93-98 said, earnings reports are glorified PR stunts intended to paint as ideal of a picture as legally possible to pitch to existing and potential investors. So I didn't expect many (if any) of your predictions to be represented in the report. That said, i do want to know if you've changed your mind about any of your previous comments. Particularly the following (and if you have further clarifying details or can say if/when we would have heard about these things officially)-
Worth nothing that these two positive items I highlighted in a post last night were indeed the headlines of the day that saved their report.
But please, keep telling me how I got it all wrong.![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.