• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Well you enjoyed doing comparisons for similar movies at opposing studios in the past….Both Predator and The Running Man were science fiction action movies staring Arnold Schwarzenegger in the 80’s…but I guess this time it does not fit your narrative

I don't know that I've ever cared about Paramount Studios in the past, but as I did go to Carowinds several times in the 90's, let's do it! 🥳

I actually had no idea what The Running Man was until yesterday, as I haven't seen a single commercial for it yet. Turns out, it's a remake of the original 80's movie starring Richard Dawson (whom I adored!) and Arnold Schwarzenneger. Who knew?!

Is anyone getting commercials for The Running Man on their algorithms or TV sets? Or is it just me?

Predator: Badlands - $105 Production, $136 Global Box Office = $63 Million loss and narrowing
The Running Man
- $110 Production, $28 Global Box Office = $124 Million loss and narrowing

Screenshot 2025-11-18 10.49.15 AM.png
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I don't know that I've ever cared about Paramount Studios in the past, but as I did go to Carowinds several times in the 90's, let's do it! 🥳

I actually had no idea what The Running Man was until yesterday, as I haven't seen a single commercial for it yet. Turns out, it's a remake of the original 80's movie starring Richard Dawson (whom I adored!) and Arnold Schwarzenneger. Who knew?!

Is anyone getting commercials for The Running Man on their algorithms or TV sets? Or is it just me?

Predator: Badlands - $105 Production, $136 Global Box Office = $63 Million loss and narrowing
The Running Man
- $110 Production, $28 Global Box Office = $124 Million loss and narrowing

View attachment 893317
I can't speak for everyone but I've been seeing ads for Running Man for about a month now.

Also I think the idea was to compare the 1987 Arnie Running Man with the 2025 Powell Running Man, as you like to do.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I can't speak for everyone but I've been seeing ads for Running Man for about a month now.

Also I think the idea was to compare the 1987 Arnie Running Man with the 2025 Powell Running Man, as you like to do.

Oh.

You would think with my algorithm tracking all the times I've watched reruns of Match Game '74 (and '73, and '77, and '75, and '76) and giving a Thumbs Up because Richard Dawson always went to the mat for contestants when the judges got too buzzer happy, that they'd think I might want to see the remake of Richard Dawson's classic The Running Man in theaters.



Or, actually, the algorithm is probably smarter than that. Still, has there ever been a man who was both a game show celebrity panelist and celebrity host that was more endearing to America? I say no! Algorithms be damned.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Still, has there ever been a man who was both a game show celebrity panelist and celebrity host that was more endearing to America? I say no! Algorithms be damned.
Depends on which generation you ask.

Some would say Drew Carey, some Steve Harvey, others Bob Barker. Quite a few game show hosts who were also panelists over the years.
 

coffeefan

Well-Known Member
It's rumored to have the first teaser for Doomsday too.

Your post made me do a double-take and think... "Did I miss something? Is The Running Man from a Disney studio?"

I had to do a 3 second Google search to learn and... nope. Phew! You scared me for a second.

I'm not sure any of us Disney fans care about The Running Man, as it's produced and distributed by Paramount Pictures.

Does Paramount even still have a licensing agreement with a theme park chain? Does it still have branding at Carowinds?

Back to Google... nope. Paramount Pictures has no theme parks left, and not even a licensing agreement with a park today. What was your point on the weak box office of The Running Man again? 🤔
I'd like to think many of us who post here enjoy movies in general. I quoted your post, since it had the weekend numbers, but I didn't mean to direct it at you. DKampy did bring up an interesting comparison though.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Depends on which generation you ask.

Some would say Drew Carey, some Steve Harvey, others Bob Barker. Quite a few game show hosts who were also panelists over the years.

Sure, but few stuck up for contestants quite like Richard Dawson. He was always a doll, whether he was host or panelist.

But as much as I adore Richard Dawson, my goal in life was to be able to enter a room/party/event like Kitty Carlisle always did on To Tell The Truth. Talk about always making an entrance! She was fantastic at that. Life goals...

 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Sure, but few stuck up for contestants quite like Richard Dawson. He was always a doll, whether he was host or panelist.

But as much as I adore Richard Dawson, my goal in life was to be able to enter a room/party/event like Kitty Carlisle always did on To Tell The Truth. Talk about always making an entrance! She was fantastic at that. Life goals...


That game show was mostly before my time, so I never saw it or her.

But if you want to walk/float into a room and kiss everyone like her, I sure hope you're at the right place as some might not take kindly to a random kiss from a random guy. ;)
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
I saw Wicked: For Good yesterday. Those of you planning to see it are in for a treat. It is every bit as good (!) as Part 1 and deserves to make oodles of money.
I saw the movie last night as well. While I think it's as good in quality as part 1, I don't know if it will have the rewatchability factor of the first part in movie theaters.

Having never seen the Broadway show before, I was surprised and how unrelentingly sad and dark the second part was. In many ways, Wicked: For Good was the more sophisticated film, but for those drawn more to the "fun" aspects of the first film, this would be a harder one to sit through. I CRIED so much in the last third of the film, lol.

I think Wicked and Wicked: For Good will pair nicely as a double feature in both theaters and TV reruns.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
I saw the movie last night as well. While I think it's as good in quality as part 1, I don't know if it will have the rewatchability factor of the first part in movie theaters.

Having never seen the Broadway show before, I was surprised and how unrelentingly sad and dark the second part was. In many ways, Wicked: For Good was the more sophisticated film, but for those drawn more to the "fun" aspects of the first film, this would be a harder one to sit through. I CRIED so much in the last third of the film, lol.

I think Wicked and Wicked: For Good will pair nicely as a double feature in both theaters and TV reruns.
I agree it’s not as lighthearted as the first film—I too was crying quite a bit. Regardless of whether the general public will want to see it more than once, I’m already planning my next trip to the cinema.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Sure, but few stuck up for contestants quite like Richard Dawson. He was always a doll, whether he was host or panelist.

But as much as I adore Richard Dawson, my goal in life was to be able to enter a room/party/event like Kitty Carlisle always did on To Tell The Truth. Talk about always making an entrance! She was fantastic at that. Life goals...


A pant suit?!

Quelle outrement!
 

Phroobar

Well-Known Member
My theater is doing a double feature of Wicked and Wicked for Good on Thursday. It starts at 11am and goes for five and quarter hours. The $5 movie tomorrow is the original Wizard of Oz.

Too bad Disney doesn't re-release Return of OZ.
Or maybe that is a good thing.
 

LittleBuford

Well-Known Member
My theater is doing a double feature of Wicked and Wicked for Good on Thursday. It starts at 11am and goes for five and quarter hours. The $5 movie tomorrow is the original Wizard of Oz.

Too bad Disney doesn't re-release Return of OZ.
Or maybe that is a good thing.
I love all four of the films you mentioned. Return to Oz is an underrated gem!
 

brideck

Well-Known Member
I agree it’s not as lighthearted as the first film—I too was crying quite a bit. Regardless of whether the general public will want to see it more than once, I’m already planning my next trip to the cinema.

Sometimes, heartbreak feels good in a place like this.

I love all four of the films you mentioned. Return to Oz is an underrated gem!

My spouse and I both love it as well. Our local single-screen variety theater just showed Return to Oz a couple of weeks ago. The marquee said something like "Just a normal kids movie" above the title -- had us both laughing. Alas, we couldn't make it out to that showing.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom