YouTube comments don't provide rankings.
The TripAdvisor reviews have also been mentioned in this regard:
Ok…so after reading through the TA complaints…my take:
There is a lot of validity to many of those complaints.
1. It doesn’t handle the weather AT ALL. That’s the worst offense.
2. It’s under equipped for crowds…but that can be addressed.
3. The breakdowns are a big problem…but that can also be addressed. That has a lot to do with how the operators ( all of them) have begun to “bass ackwards” their pricing and profit strategies.
4. It is a “caste system” no doubt…and That’s rampant across travel and does and should bring a hell of a lot of criticism to pay.
The success or failure…”ratings”…will shake out based on what they do or don’t do to fix the park? And do you know the last 5 or so “new parks” in the US…they are:
Epic
California adventure
IOA
DAK
USO
MGM
That’s the list…for the whole darn country.
The reason I bring this up is what park amongst those didn’t suffer from major “underbuild” problems?
The answer is one: islands of adventure…the rest were all lacking and some still are…uso is in the worst shape now…California adventure has made the most strides (shocking) as it stands…my opinion.
But also the tank reviews on TA have some things that trigger the smell test:
1. “We were there on the last day of a 14 day combo ticket” has some baggage - from across the pond attached to it. They (it’s the truth) have been bombing TA reviews for decades. Sometimes legit…sometimes things not in the control of the operator at all. What sense is that?
2. Our party ranged from a 7 year old neuro divergent to a 75 year old…
…ummm…yeah…just a couple of things there
3. Complaints about the customers. Again…out of the control of the proprietors and should never be the basis of a review.
My take is the reviews are 50/50…some
Legit and some redonkulous. As is with the internet often times.
They built the park…they deserve the right to tweak it and see…that’s fair.